David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):91 – 121 (1992)
Abstract Boyle distinguished clearly between the areas which we would call scientific and theological. However, he felt that they overlapped seamlessly, and that the truths we discovered (or which were revealed to us) in one of these areas would be relevant to us in the other. In this paper I outline and discuss Boyle's views on the limitations of human knowing, Boyle's arguments in favour of accepting the revelations of the Christian faith, and his views on the kind of epistomological standing that scientific knowledge claims have. Given this background I then consider the relation between hypotheses, theories and facts in Boyle's work, and consider a particular case, that of Boyle's Law, as an exemplification of the claims made in the rest of the paper
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Aristotle (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton University Press.
Keith Arnold (1989). Pascal's Great Experiment. Dialogue 28 (03):401-.
Keith Arnold (1989). Pascal's Theory of Scientific Knowledge. Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (4):531-544.
Francis Bacon (1969). The Works of Francis Bacon. St. Clair Shores, Mich.,Scholarly Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rose-Mary Sargent (2004). Robert Boyle and the Masculine Methods of Science. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):857-867.
Peter Alexander (1985). Ideas, Qualities, and Corpuscles: Locke and Boyle on the External World. Cambridge University Press.
J. J. MacIntosh (2005). Boyle and Locke on Observation, Testimony, Demonstration and Experience. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):275-288.
A. Pyle (2002). Boyle on Science and the Mechanical Philosophy: A Reply to Chalmers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):171-186.
J. J. MacIntosh (2005). Robert Boyle (1627-1691); The Philosophy of Robert Boyle. Dialogue 44 (1):167-169.
J. J. MacIntosh (2005). Robert Boyle (1627-1691); the Philosophy of Robert Boyle: Scrupulosity and Science. Dialogue 44 (1):167-169.
Jan-Erik Jones (2005). Boyle, Classification and the Workmanship of the Understanding Thesis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (2):171-183.
Simon B. Duffy (2006). The Difference Between Science and Philosophy: The Spinoza-Boyle Controversy Revisited. Paragraph 29 (2):115-138.
Rose‐Mary Sargent (2004). Robert Boyle and the Masculine Methods of Science. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):857-867.
Jan W. Wojcik (1997). Robert Boyle and the Limits of Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #88,529 of 1,168,076 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,420 of 1,168,076 )
How can I increase my downloads?