Self-efficacy as an intrapersonal predictor for internal whistleblowing: A us and canada examination [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 79 (4):407 - 421 (2008)
Examining intrapersonal factors theorized to influence ethics reporting decisions, the relation of self-efficacy as a predictor of propensity for internal whistleblowing is investigated within a US and Canadian multi-regional context. Over 900 professionals from a total of nine regions in Canada and the US participated. Self-efficacy was found to influence participant reported propensity for internal whistleblowing consistently in both the US and Canada. Seasoned participants with greater management and work experience demonstrated higher levels of self-efficacy while gender was also found to be influential to self-efficacy. These individual traits, although related to self-efficacy, did not directly relate to propensities for internal whistleblowing. The findings demonstrate that self-efficacy could represent an important individual trait for examining whistleblowing issues. Internal whistleblowing is becoming an important organizational consideration in many areas of North America, yet there is relatively little research on the topic. Organizations seeking effective internal reporting systems should consider the influence of self-efficacy along with its potential reporting influence. By empirically testing an under-examined component of theory related to internal whistleblowing, this effort contributes to management literature, extending the knowledge beyond a US context, and provides recommendation for managing individual bias with internal reporting systems.
|Keywords||Canada ethics reporting internal whistleblowing self-efficacy United States|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Clifford Geertz (1973). Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books
Peter B. Jubb (1999). Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 21 (1):77 - 94.
A. A. Tavakoli, John P. Keenan & B. Cranjak-Karanovic (2003). Culture and Whistleblowing an Empirical Study of Croatian and United States Managers Utilizing Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):49 - 64.
O. C. Ferrell, Debbie Thorne LeClair & Linda Ferrell (1998). The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations: A Framework for Ethical Compliance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (4):353-363.
Muel Kaptein (2002). Guidelines for the Development of an Ethics Safety Net. Journal of Business Ethics 41 (3):217 - 234.
Citations of this work BETA
P. G. Cassematis & R. Wortley (2013). Prediction of Whistleblowing or Non-Reporting Observation: The Role of Personal and Situational Factors. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):615-634.
Jason MacGregor & Martin Stuebs (2013). The Silent Samaritan Syndrome: Why the Whistle Remains Unblown. Journal of Business Ethics 120 (2):1-16.
Derek Dalton & Robin R. Radtke (2013). The Joint Effects of Machiavellianism and Ethical Environment on Whistle-Blowing. Journal of Business Ethics 117 (1):153-172.
Joanne C. Jones, Gary Spraakman & Cristóbal Sánchez-Rodríguez (2014). What’s in It for Me? An Examination of Accounting Students’ Likelihood to Report Faculty Misconduct. Journal of Business Ethics 123 (4):645-667.
Similar books and articles
David Lewis (2011). Whistleblowing in a Changing Legal Climate: Is It Time to Revisit Our Approach to Trust and Loyalty at the Workplace? Business Ethics 20 (1):71-87.
Randy K. Chiu (2003). Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing Intention: Examining the Moderating Role of Locus of Control. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):65 - 74.
James A. Benson & David L. Ross (1998). Sundstrand: A Case Study in Transformation of Cultural Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (14):1517 - 1527.
TerryMorehead Dworkin & Melissa S. Baucus (1998). Internal Vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowering Processes. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1281-1298.
Heungsik Park & John Blenkinsopp (2009). Whistleblowing as Planned Behavior – a Survey of South Korean Police Officers. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):545 - 556.
Janet P. Near & Terry Morehead Dworkin (1998). Responses to Legislative Changes: Corporate Whistleblowing Policies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (14):1551 - 1561.
Heungsik Park, Michael T. Rehg & Donggi Lee (2005). The Influence of Confucian Ethics and Collectivism on Whistleblowing Intentions: A Study of South Korean Public Employees. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 58 (4):387 - 403.
Jessica R. Mesmer-Magnus & Chockalingam Viswesvaran (2005). Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (3):277 - 297.
Randi L. Sims & John P. Keenan (1998). Predictors of External Whistleblowing: Organizational and Intrapersonal Variables. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (4):411-421.
Julia Zhang, Randy Chiu & Liqun Wei (2009). Decision-Making Process of Internal Whistleblowing Behavior in China: Empirical Evidence and Implications. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):25 - 41.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #106,554 of 1,725,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #210,899 of 1,725,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?