David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):135-146 (2012)
According to one creation myth, analytic philosophy emerged in Cambridge when Moore and Russell abandoned idealism in favour of naive realism: every word stood for something; it was only after “the Fall,” Russell's discovery of his theory of descriptions, that they realized some complex phrases (“the present King of France”) didn't stand for anything. It has become a commonplace of recent scholarship to object that even before the Fall, Russell acknowledged that such phrases may fail to denote. But we need to go further: even before the Fall, Russell had taken an altogether more discerning approach to the ontology of logic and relations than is usually recognized
|Keywords||Russell relations Wittgenstein logical constants|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Dover Publications.
Bertrand Russell (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. Dover Publications.
Bertrand Russell (1903). Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1979). Notebooks, 1914-1916. University of Chicago Press.
Bertrand Russell (1912). The Problems of Philosophy. Barnes & Noble Books.
Citations of this work BETA
Alexis Papazoglou (2012). Philosophy, Its Pitfalls, Some Rescue Plans, and Their Complications. Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):2-19.
Similar books and articles
Peter Hylton (1990). Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Peter Ms Hacker (2007). Analytic Philosophy: Beyond the Linguistic Turn and Back Again. In Micahel Beaney (ed.), The Analytic Turn. Routledge
T. Allan Hillman (2008). The Early Russell on the Metaphysics of Substance in Leibniz and Bradley. Synthese 163 (2):245 - 261.
James Levine (2001). On Russell's Vulnerability to Russell's Paradox. History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (4):207-231.
Paul Redding (2010). The Possibility of German Idealism After Analytic Philosophy : McDowell, Brandom and Beyond. In James Williams (ed.), Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum
L. J. Russell (1946). Physics and Experience. By Bertrand Russell. The Henry Sidgwick Lecture Delivered at Newnham College, Cambridge. 11, 10, 1945. (1946. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 26. Price 1s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 21 (80):276-.
David Bostock (2009). Russell's Early Theory of Denoting. History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (1):49-67.
Tom Rockmore (2000). Recent Analytical Philosophy and Idealism. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:173-181.
Charles Pigden (2007). Russell's Moral Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ian Proops (2006). Soames on the Metaphysics and Epistemology of Moore and Russell. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 129 (3):627–635.
John Bolender (2001). An Argument for Idealism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (4):37-61.
Karl Ameriks (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
Nicholas Griffin (1991). Russell's Idealist Apprenticeship. Clarendon Press.
Added to index2012-01-06
Total downloads52 ( #92,546 of 1,913,505 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #223,669 of 1,913,505 )
How can I increase my downloads?