The Cambridge Revolt Against Idealism: Was There Ever an Eden?

Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):135-146 (2012)
Abstract
According to one creation myth, analytic philosophy emerged in Cambridge when Moore and Russell abandoned idealism in favour of naive realism: every word stood for something; it was only after “the Fall,” Russell's discovery of his theory of descriptions, that they realized some complex phrases (“the present King of France”) didn't stand for anything. It has become a commonplace of recent scholarship to object that even before the Fall, Russell acknowledged that such phrases may fail to denote. But we need to go further: even before the Fall, Russell had taken an altogether more discerning approach to the ontology of logic and relations than is usually recognized
Keywords Russell  relations  Wittgenstein  logical constants
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,095
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
A. J. Ayer (1971). Russell and Moore. Cambridge,Harvard University Press.

View all 15 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
James Levine (2001). On Russell's Vulnerability to Russell's Paradox. History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (4):207-231.
David Bostock (2009). Russell's Early Theory of Denoting. History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (1):49-67.
Tom Rockmore (2000). Recent Analytical Philosophy and Idealism. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:173-181.
Charles Pigden, Russell's Moral Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
John Bolender (2001). An Argument for Idealism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (4):37-61.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-01-06

Total downloads

44 ( #41,416 of 1,102,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #34,166 of 1,102,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.