David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics 24 (5):211-217 (2010)
Fast forward 50 years into the future. A look back at what occurred in the field of bioethics since 2010 reveals that a conference in 2050 commemorated the death of bioethics. In a steady progression over the years, the field became increasingly fragmented and bureaucratized. Disagreement and dissension were rife, and this once flourishing, multidisciplinary field began to splinter in multiple ways. Prominent journals folded, one by one, and were replaced with specialized publications dealing with genethics, reproethics, nanoethics, and necroethics. Mainstream bioethics organizations also collapsed, giving way to new associations along disciplinary and sub-disciplinary lines. Physicians established their own journals, and specialty groups broke away from more general associations of medical ethics. Lawyers also split into three separate factions, and philosophers rejected all but the most rigorous, analytic articles into their newly established journal. Matters finally came to a head with global warming, the world-wide spread of malaria and dengue, and the cost of medical treatments out of reach for almost everyone. The result was the need to develop plans for strict rationing of medical care. At the same time, recognition emerged of the importance of the right to health and the need for global justice in health. By 2060, a spark of hope was ignited, opening the door to the resuscitation of bioethics and involvement of the global community.
|Keywords||demise of bioethics future of bioethics history of bioethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Charles L. Bosk (2008). What Would You Do?: Juggling Bioethics and Ethnography. University of Chicago Press.
Søren Holm & Bryn Williams-Jones (2006). Global Bioethics – Myth or Reality? BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-10.
Ronald Michael Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.) (2008). Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press.
Howard Brody (2009). The Future of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Susan Sherwin (2011). Looking Backwards, Looking Forward: Hopes for Bioethics' Next Twenty-Five Years. Bioethics 25 (2):75-82.
Sirkku K. Hellsten (2008). Global Bioethics: Utopia or Reality? Developing World Bioethics 8 (2):70-81.
Kazumasa Hoshino, H. Tristram Engelhardt & Lisa M. Rasmussen (eds.) (2002). Bioethics and Moral Content: National Traditions of Health Care Morality: Papers Dedicated in Tribute to Kazumasa Hoshino. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jonathan Moreno (2007). Pt. VIII. Public and Global Health. The Implications of Public Health for Bioethics / Jeffrey Kahn and Anna Mastroianni ; Global Health / Ruth Macklin ; Bioethics and Bioterrorism. [REVIEW] In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press
George J. Annas (2010). Worst Case Bioethics: Death, Disaster, and Public Health. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-05-04
Total downloads50 ( #86,921 of 1,911,320 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,064 of 1,911,320 )
How can I increase my downloads?