The Esse/Essentia Argument in Aquinas's De ente et essentia

The purpose of the article is to offer a detailed exegetical analysis of the argument in chapter four of "de ente et essentia" in which aquinas argues for a distinction between "esse" and essence and to develop an interpretation of it on the basis of the analysis. I argue that the reconstructed argument shows that aquinas argues for a real distinction and that he establishes it earlier in the argument than some commentators have thought. I criticize a rival interpretation of the argument defended recently by joseph owens.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Richard Colledge (2008). On Ex(s)Istere. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:263-274.
    Paul Gilbert (2009). Et hoc dicimus Deum. Giornale di Metafisica 31 (3):465 - 480.
    Thomas Sullivan & Russell Pannier (1995). God and Subsistent Forms in De Ente Et Essentia. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 69:205-215.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    16 ( #86,005 of 1,089,053 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    4 ( #24,247 of 1,089,053 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.