Graduate studies at Western
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):315–324 (2006)
|Abstract||Julia Annas has affirmed that the kind of modern moral skepticism which denies the existence of objective moral values rests upon a contrast between morality and some other system of beliefs about the world which is not called into doubt. Richard Bett, on the other hand, has argued that the existence of such a contrast is not a necessary condition for espousing that kind of moral skepticism. My purpose in this paper is to show that Bett fails to make a good case against Annas’ thesis. To accomplish this, it will be helpful to consider the Pyrrhonean attitude towards morality as expounded in Sextus Empiricus’ work.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel Vazquez (2009). Reason in Check: The Skepticism of Sextus Empiricus. Hermathena (186):43-57.
Stephen Maitzen (2006). The Impossibility of Local Skepticism. Philosophia 34 (4):453-464.
Paul Kurtz (2010). Exuberant Skepticism. Prometheus Books 59 John Glenn Drive.
Joshua Seigal (2010). Skeptical Theism, Moral Skepticism, and Divine Deception. Forum Philosophicum 15 (2):251-274.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2006). Moral Skepticisms. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #44,914 of 739,429 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #13,453 of 739,429 )
How can I increase my downloads?