Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 153 (1):123-142 (2011)
|Abstract||I argue that we should reject the sparse view that there are or could be only a small number of rather distinct senses. When one appreciates this then one can see that there is no need to choose between the standard criteria that have been proposed as ways of individuating the senses—representation, phenomenal character, proximal stimulus and sense organ—or any other criteria that one may deem important. Rather, one can use these criteria in conjunction to form a fine-grained taxonomy of the senses. We can think of these criteria as defining a multidimensional space within which we can locate each of the senses that we are familiar with and which also defines the space of possible senses there could be|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fiona Macpherson (2011). Individuating the Senses. In , The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Matthew Nudds (2004). The Significance of the Senses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):31-51.
Kevin C. Klement (2003). The Number of Senses. Erkenntnis 58 (3):303 - 323.
Matthew Nudds (2009). Discriminating Senses. The Philosopher's Magazine 45 (45):92-98.
Mohan Matthen (forthcoming). The Individuation of the Senses. In , Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press.
Matthew Ratcliffe (2012). What is Touch? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):413 - 432.
Benny Shanon (1991). Representations - Senses and Reasons. Philosophical Psychology 4 (3):355-74.
Richard Gray (2011). On the Nature of the Senses. In Fiona Macpherson (ed.), The Senses: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press.
Fiona Macpherson (ed.) (2011). The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Matthew Nudds (2011). The Senses as Psychological Kinds. In Fiona Macpherson (ed.), The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford.
Kc Klement (2010). The Senses of Functions in the Logic of Sense and Denotation. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):153-188.
Louw Feenstra & Johannes Borgstein (2003). The Senses in Perspective. Ludus Vitalis 11 (20):135-157.
Added to index2010-10-05
Total downloads102 ( #7,649 of 756,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #15,168 of 756,891 )
How can I increase my downloads?