Viète, Descartes, and the Emergence of Modern Mathematics

Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25 (2):87-117 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

François Viète is often regarded as the first modern mathematician on the grounds that he was the first to develop the literal notation, that is, the use of two sorts of letters, one for the unknown and the other for the known parameters of a problem. The fact that he achieved neither a modern conception of quantity nor a modern understanding of curves, both of which are explicit in Descartes’ Geometry, is to be explained on this view “by an incomplete symbolization rather than by any obstacle intrinsic in the system.” Descartes’ Geometry provides only a “clearer expression” of themes already sounded in Viète’s work, one that perfects Viète’s literal calculus and gives it “its modern form”; it merely continues the “‘new’ and ‘pure’ algebra which Viète first established as the ‘general analytic art’.” It can seem, furthermore, that this must be right, that had there been some obstacle intrinsic to Viète’s system that barred the way to a modern conception of quantity and a modern understanding of curves, then Descartes’ Geometry would have had to have taken a very different form than it did. As it was, Descartes had only to improve Viète’s symbolism, free himself of the last vestiges of the ancient view of geometrical and arithmetical objects, and apply the new symbolism to the study of curves in order to achieve what Viète did not but could have. But what, really, is the status of this “could have”; what would it actually have taken for Viète to achieve Descartes’ results in the Geometry? The interest of the question lies in its potential to better our understanding of the nature of modern mathematics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes' dream: the world according to mathematics.Philip J. Davis - 1986 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Reuben Hersh.
Descartes' epistemology.Lex Newman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Descartes and the cylindrical helix.Paolo Mancosu & Andrew Arana - 2010 - Historia Mathematica 37 (3):403-427.
Vico’s Critique of Descartes’ Cognitive and Moral Optimism.Alexander L. Gungov - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:125-131.
The modern aspect of mathematics.Lucienne Félix - 1960 - New York,: Basic Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
32 (#431,738)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Danielle Macbeth
Haverford College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references