David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Nursing Philosophy 10 (4):287-296 (2009)
Reasons for the limited uptake of the clinician–scientist role within nursing are examined, specifically: the lack of consensus about the nature of nursing science; the varying approaches to epistemology; and the influence of post-modern thought on knowledge development in nursing. It is suggested that under-development of this role may be remedied by achieving agreement that science is a necessary, worthy pursuit for nursing, and that rigorous science conducted from a clinical perspective serves nursing well. Straddling practice and research is a powerful strategy for ensuring relevant research while forging strong links with practice. The clinician–scientist role, typically requiring a 75:25 ratio between research and clinical activities, is well established in medicine. Nursing, however, has been slow to institute the role; it is rare within North America, Australia, and western European countries, and almost non-existent outside those areas. Beyond structural obstacles, philosophical issues may explain nursing's reluctance to implement the role. Following a survey of clinician–scientist roles throughout the world, the nature of nursing science and epistemology, and the influence of post-modern thought on nursing attitudes to research are examined with respect to their influence on this role. The nurse clinician–scientist role holds promise for making strides in clinically relevant research, and for accelerating the knowledge cycle from clinical problem to research question to change in clinical practice.
|Keywords||nurse researcher clinician–scientist epistemology post‐modernism nursing science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Julianne Cheek & Sam Porter (1997). Reviewing Foucault: Possibilities and Problems for Nursing and Health Care. Nursing Inquiry 4 (2):108-119.
John Paley (2005). Error and Objectivity: Cognitive Illusions and Qualitative Research. Nursing Philosophy 6 (3):196-209.
M. A. Paley (2005). Error and Objectivity: Cognitive Illusions and Qualitative Research. Nursing Philosophy 6 (3):196–209.
Beverly J. B. Whelton (2002). Human Nature as a Source of Practical Truth: Aristotelian–Thomistic Realism and the Practical Science of Nursing. Nursing Philosophy 3 (1):35-46.
Beverly J. B. Whelton Rn (2002). Human Nature as a Source of Practical Truth: Aristotelian–Thomistic Realism and the Practical Science of Nursing. Nursing Philosophy 3 (1):35-46.
Citations of this work BETA
Gary Rolfe (2010). A Reply to 'Why Nursing has Not Embraced the Clinician-Scientist Role' by Martha MacKay: Nursing Science and the Postmodern Menace. Nursing Philosophy 11 (2):136-140.
Similar books and articles
Mark W. Risjord (2010). Nursing Knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
Margaret Keatings & Diana Dick (1989). Ethics and Politics of Resource Allocation: The Role of Nursing. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):187 - 192.
Derek Sellman (2011). What Makes a Good Nurse: Why the Virtues Are Important for Nurses. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Ian E. Thompson, Kath M. Melia & Kenneth M. Boyd (eds.) (2006). Nursing Ethics. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
Jason S. McCready (2010). Jamesian Pragmatism: A Framework for Working Towards Unified Diversity in Nursing Knowledge Development. Nursing Philosophy 11 (3):191-203.
Stuart Nairn (2009). Social Structure and Nursing Research. Nursing Philosophy 10 (3):191-202.
Stephen Holland (2010). Scepticism About the Virtue Ethics Approach to Nursing Ethics. Nursing Philosophy 11 (3):151-158.
Added to index2009-09-08
Total downloads29 ( #130,329 of 1,790,148 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,637 of 1,790,148 )
How can I increase my downloads?