E. G. Boring's philosophy of science

Philosophy of Science 32 (2):194-201 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Professor Boring is best known for his work in the history of psychology and for good reason: his History of Experimental Psychology and his Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology are truly impressive works. However, he has also written numerous articles in the philosophy of science, the psychology of scientific discovery, and the sociology of scientific production, but unfortunately this material has not heretofore been readily accessible. This deficiency, however, has been corrected efficiently by the recent publication of Boring's History, Psychology, and Science: Selected Papers, edited by Robert I. Watson and Donald T. Campbell. The essays in this book represent the whole range of Boring's interests and make essential reading for any serious student of the philosophy of science. Of especial value to philosophers are the essays listed under the titles “The Scientific Method” and “The Mind-Body Problem.” Since the groupings overlap, however, the following essays in other categories are also crucial: “The Nature and History of Experimental Control,” “William James and the Psychology of the Present,” and “The Influence of Evolutionary Theory Upon American Psychological Thought.” All of these essays are interesting but the ones on operationism and theory in psychology, and the one on evolutionary notions in American psychology, are classics and worth very careful consideration and comment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ernest Nagel's the structure of science.Edward H. Madden - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (1):64-70.
Boring Beauty and Universal Morality: Kant on the Ideal of Beauty.Rachel Zuckert - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):107 – 130.
Why has bioethics become so Boring?Albert R. Jonsen - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):689 – 699.
Why isn't minimal art Boring?Richard Lind - 1986 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (2):195-197.
Is Boring art just Boring?Derek Matravers - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (4):425-426.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
206 (#94,291)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references