Philosophy of Science 33 (3):278-286 (1966)
|Abstract||A number of authors recently have pointed out what they think are enlightening similarities between psychoanalysis and history. In stressing such similarities they are usually trying to justify their own particular characterization of psychoanalysis. I show wherein I think these characterizations go wrong and at the same time try my own hand at clarifying the nature of psychoanalytic propositions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joy Damousi & Mariano Ben Plotkin (2012). Psychoanalysis in Brazil During Vargas' Time. In Joy Damousi & Mariano Ben Plotkin (eds.), Psychoanalysis and Politics: Histories of Psychoanalysis Under Conditions of Restricted Political Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Julia Borossa & Ivan Ward (eds.) (2009). Psychoanalysis, Fascism, and Fundamentalism. Edinburgh University Press.
William J. Massicotte, A Philosophical Examination of Recent Clinical and Theoretical Psychoanalysis.
Louise Gyler (2010). The Gendered Unconscious: Can Gender Discourses Subvert Psychoanalysis? Routledge.
David James Fisher (2009). Cultural Theory and Psychoanalytic Tradition. Transaction Publishers.
David M. Black (2001). Psychoanalysis and the Function of Consciousness. In Anthony Molino & Christine Ware (eds.), Where Id Was: Challenging Normalization in Psychoanalysis. Disseminations, Psychoanalysis in Contexts. Wesleyan University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?