David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2007)
Many philosophers these days consider themselves naturalists, but it's doubtful any two of them intend the same position by the term. In Second Philosophy, Penelope Maddy describes and practices a particularly austere form of naturalism called "Second Philosophy". Without a definitive criterion for what counts as "science" and what doesn't, Second Philosophy can't be specified directly ("trust only the methods of science" for example), so Maddy proceeds instead by illustrating the behaviors of an idealized inquirer she calls the "Second Philosopher". mhis Second Philosopher begins from perceptual common sense experimentation, theory formation and testing, working all the while to asses, correct and improve her methods as she goes. Second Philosophy is then the result of the Second Philosopher's investigations. Maddy delineates the Second Philosopher's approach by tracing her reactions to various familiar skeptical and transcendental views (Descartes, Kant, Carnap, late Putnam, van Fraassen), comparing her methods to those of other self-described naturalists (especially Quine), and examining a prominent contemporary debate (between disquotationalists and correspondence theorists in the theory of truth) to extract a properly second-philosophical line of thought. She then undertakes to practice Second Philosophy in her reflections on the ground of logical truth, the methodology, ontology and epistemology of mathematics, and the general prospects for metaphysics naturalized
|Keywords||Naturalism Mathematics Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$17.87 used (65% off) $22.47 new (56% off) $48.40 direct from Amazon (4% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B828.2.M33 2007|
|ISBN(s)||0199273669 0199566240 9780199273669|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Boaz Miller (2016). What is Hacking’s Argument for Entity Realism? Synthese 193 (3):991-1006.
Bas C. van Fraassen (2009). The Perils of Perrin, in the Hands of Philosophers. Philosophical Studies 143 (1):5 - 24.
Paul Thagard (2009). Why Cognitive Science Needs Philosophy and Vice Versa. Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2):237-254.
Luca Incurvati (2012). How to Be a Minimalist About Sets. Philosophical Studies 159 (1):69-87.
Jacob Busch (2011). Scientific Realism and the Indispensability Argument for Mathematical Realism: A Marriage Made in Hell. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):307-325.
Similar books and articles
Paul Draper (2004). On the Nature of Naturalism. Philo 7 (2):146-155.
Jeffrey W. Roland (2007). Maddy and Mathematics: Naturalism or Not. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):423 - 450.
Penelope Maddy (1995). Naturalism and Ontology. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (3):248-270.
Penelope J. Maddy (2001). Some Naturalistic Reflections on Set Theoretic Method. Topoi 20 (1):17-27.
Penelope Maddy (1990). Realism in Mathematics. Oxford University Prress.
G. Rosen (1999). Review of P. Maddy, Naturalism in Mathematics. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (3):467-474.
Mark Balaguer (1999). Review of P. Maddy, Naturalism in Mathematics. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 66 (3):502-.
Penelope Maddy (2001). Naturalism: Friends and Foes. Noûs 35 (s15):37-67.
Penelope Maddy (1997). Naturalism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads89 ( #43,756 of 1,789,800 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #47,150 of 1,789,800 )
How can I increase my downloads?