David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This paper analyses two methods commonly used to understand legal language: deontic logic and the analysis of concepts taken as fundamental for any one or more areas of the law (sometimes called the philosophical foundations of law project). In doing so I introduce what I call the phenomenon of linguistic regress, and I do so in order to show why and how these methods necessarily fail as theories of legal language. I argue, in short, that any form of content-determination of concepts or norms fails as a method for understanding legal language because of the phenomenon of linguistic regress. Given the failure of these two methods, I argue that legal theorists should instead adopt an approach that focuses on explaining the community-based use of commonly-recurring terms and phrases found in legal language - a use, furthermore, that is most commonly exercised by legal experts (of varying degrees of skills), operating in different and interacting contexts of expertise (judicial, legislative and scholarly), and more broadly, as members of a legal community not impervious to influence from other kinds of communities.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ernest Bruncken & Layton B. Register (eds.) (1917/1969). Science of Legal Method. New York,A. M. Kelley.
James R. Maxeiner, The Rules of Law in the Reform of Legal Education: Teaching the Legal Mind in Japanese Law Schools.
V. K. Bhatia, Christopher Candlin & Paola Evangelisti Allori (eds.) (2008). Language, Culture and the Law: The Formulation of Legal Concepts Across Systems and Cultures. Peter Lang.
Brian Bix (1993). Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Oxford University Press.
Richard L. Schwartz (1992). Internal and External Method in the Study of Law. Law and Philosophy 11 (3):179 - 199.
Luís Duarte D'Almeida (2011). Legal Statements and Normative Language. Law and Philosophy 30 (2):167-199.
Pavlos Eleftheriadis (2008). Legal Rights. Oxford University Press.
Marta Chromá (2008). Semantic and Legal Interpretation : Two Approaches to Legal Translation. In V. K. Bhatia, Christopher Candlin & Paola Evangelisti Allori (eds.), Language, Culture and the Law: The Formulation of Legal Concepts Across Systems and Cultures. P. Lang
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #268,671 of 1,796,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,501 of 1,796,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?