David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 6 (3):180-195 (2011)
Leibniz’s Law (or as it sometimes called, ‘the Indiscerniblity of Identicals’) is a widely accepted principle governing the notion of numerical identity. The principle states that if a is identical to b, then any property had by a is also had by b. Leibniz’s Law may seem like a trivial principle, but its apparent consequences are far from trivial. The law has been utilised in a wide range of arguments in metaphysics, many leading to substantive and controversial conclusions. This article discusses the applications of Leibniz’s Law to arguments in metaphysics. It begins by presenting a variety of central arguments in metaphysics which appeal to the law. The article then proceeds to discuss a range of strategies that can be drawn upon in resisting an argument by Leibniz’s Law. These strategies divide into three categories: (i) denying Leibniz’s Law; (ii) denying that the argument in question involves a genuine application of the law; and (iii) denying that the argument’s premises are true. Strategies falling under each of these three categories are discussed in turn.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David K. Lewis (1986/2001). On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell Publishers.
John Heil (2003). From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford University Press.
Nathan U. Salmon (1986). Frege's Puzzle. Ridgeview.
Laurence Horn (1989). A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press.
Kit Fine (2003). The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and its Matter. Mind 112 (446):195-234.
Citations of this work BETA
Mahrad Almotahari (2014). Metalinguistic Negation and Metaphysical Affirmation. Philosophical Studies 167 (3):497-517.
Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egré, David Ripley & Robert van Rooij (2013). Identity, Leibniz's Law and Non-Transitive Reasoning. Metaphysica 14 (2):253-264.
Similar books and articles
Harry G. Frankfurt (1976). Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1972). Leibniz. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Murali Ramachandran & Simon Langford (2000). Rigidity, Occasional Identity and Leibniz' Law. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):518 - 526.
Simon Langford & Murali Ramachandran (2000). Rigidity, Occasional Identity and Leibniz' Law. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):518-526.
By Benjamin Schnieder (2006). 'By Leibniz's Law': Remarks on a Fallacy. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):39–54.
Benjamin Schnieder (2006). 'By Leibniz's Law': Remarks on a Fallacy. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):39-54.
Paul Lodge (2010). The Empirical Grounds for Leibniz's 'Real Metaphysics'. The Leibniz Review 20:13-36.
Tobias Hansson (2007). The Problem(s) of Change Revisited. Dialectica 61 (2):265–274.
Ori Belkind (2013). Leibniz and Newton on Space. Foundations of Science 18 (3):467-497.
J. A. Cover (1999). Substance and Individuation in Leibniz. Cambridge University Press.
Simon B. Duffy (2012). The Question of Deleuze’s Neo-Leibnizianism. In Patricia Pisters, Rosi Braidotti & Alan D. Schrift (eds.), Down by Law: Revisiting Normativity with Deleuze. Bloomsbury
Simon B. Duffy (2010). Deleuze, Leibniz and Projective Geometry in the Fold. Angelaki 15 (2):129-147.
Michael V. Griffin (2012). Leibniz, God and Necessity. Cambridge University Press.
Christia Mercer (2001). Leibniz's Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-03-29
Total downloads154 ( #22,951 of 1,793,075 )
Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #30,536 of 1,793,075 )
How can I increase my downloads?