Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy 74 (1):119-121 (1999)
|Abstract||A play's text is nearly all talk, and in the performance of a play the physical activity is sparse and exceedingly limited. Used of a play, the term ‘action’ does not mean what it normally means. Its true meaning is illuminated by reference to J. L. Austin and his doctrine of speech-acts. Dramatic action is, for the most part, speech-action. And a skilful manipulation of speech-acts enables the gifted dramatist not only to tell a story but to communicate what is going on below the surface.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lawrence B. Solum (1989). Freedom of Communicative Action. Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135.
Jeffrey Hershfield (2010). What Can Austin Tell Us About Truth? Philosophical Investigations 33 (3):220-228.
Karl Schuhmann & Barry Smith (1990). Elements of Speech Act Theory in the Work of Thomas Reid. History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1):47 - 66.
John Turri (2013). Knowledge Guaranteed. Noûs 47 (3):602-612.
J. L. Austin (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.
Marina Sbisà (2006). Speech Acts Without Propositions? Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):155-178.
Roy Turner (1985). Speech and the Social Contract. Inquiry 28 (1-4):43 – 53.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,589 of 740,454 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,454 )
How can I increase my downloads?