Editors' reply

&
American Journal of Bioethics 5 (4):W2 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265160591003286

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process.Wendy Lipworth, Ian H. Kerridge, Stacy M. Carter & Miles Little - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):267-280.
Are Referees Sufficiently Informed About The Editor'S Practice?Ruth Ben-Yashar & Shmuel Nitzan - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (1):1-11.
More on the Conceptual and the Empirical: Misunderstandings, Clarifications, and Replies. [REVIEW]Michael S. Pardo & Dennis Patterson - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):215-222.
Digital alteration of photographs in consumer magazines.Shiela Reaves - 1991 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6 (3):175 – 181.
Newsroom ethics: How tough is enforcement?Richard Morin & Bruce Giles - 1986 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 2 (1):7 – 16.
Ethical practice in the accounting publishing process: Contrasting opinions of authors and editors. [REVIEW]Susan C. Borkowski & Mary Jeanne Welsh - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 25 (1):15 - 31.
Is distance critical for clinical ethicists? A reply to Glenn McGee.Susan Dorr Goold - 1997 - HEC Forum 9 (3):280-283.
The Editors reply.Miles J. Zaremski - 1982 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 10 (1):38-38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#968,362)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Magnus
Stanford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references