Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1):23-26 (1983)
|Abstract||A satisfactory normative theory of acceptable risk would be useful in resolving current disputes over government safety regulation of the workplace, consumer products, and technology. Alan Gewirth has attempted to develop such a theory, arguing from the individual's right not to be harmed by the risk-imposing activities of others. His theory is analyzed in detail, and the difficulties faced by such rights-based (deontological) approaches are pointed out. It is argued that a satisfactory theory will not be of a simple rights-based form. Reason is also given for doubting that it will be of a simple utilitarian form.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nancy Davis (1988). Rights and Moral Theory: A Critical Review of Judith Thomson's Rights, Restitution, and Risk:Rights, Restitution, and Risk. Judith Jarvis Thomson, William Parent. Ethics 98 (4):806-.
Dale Dorsey (2005). Global Justice and the Limits of Human Rights. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):562–581.
Eric Moore (2002). The Unequal Case for Animal Rights. Environmental Ethics 24 (3):295-312.
Eleanor Curran (2002). Hobbes's Theory of Rights – a Modern Interest Theory. Journal of Ethics 6 (1):63-86.
Eleanor Curran (2007). Reclaiming the Rights of the Hobbesian Subject. Palgrave Macmillan.
M. J. Zimmerman (2006). Risk, Rights, and Restitution. Philosophical Studies 128 (2):285 - 311.
George E. Panichas (1985). The Structure of Basic Human Rights. Law and Philosophy 4 (3):343 - 375.
Siegfried van Duffel (forthcoming). Natural Rights to Welfare. European Journal of Philosophy.
Eric von Magnus (1983). Rights and Risks. Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1):23 - 26.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,130 of 722,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?