Sense Organs and the Activity of Sensation in Aristotle
Phronesis 45 (4):306-330 (2000)
| Abstract | Amid the ongoing debate over the proper interpretation of Aristotle's theory of sense perception in the "De Anima," Steven Everson has recently presented a well-documented and ambitious treatment of the issue, arguing in favor of Richard Sorabji's controversial position that sense organs literally take on the qualities of their proper objects. Against the interpretation of M. F. Burnyeat, Everson and others make a compelling case the Aristotelian account of sensation requires some physical process to occur in sense organs. A detailed examination of the interpretation by Everson and Sorabji of Aristotle's theory, however, shows that their reading cannot be the correct one, since it involves many textual and philosophical difficulties. Their interpretation, for instance, would require abandoning Aristotle's requirement that only a transparent substance is suitable matter for an eye. Likewise, their understanding of the Aristotle's doctrine of sensation as the reception of form without matter in "DA 2.12" cannot be reconciled with other texts of his from "On Generation and Corruption." An analysis of these texts, as well as "DA 2.7" and "De Sensu 6" on the roles of light and the transparent medium in vision, show that, for Aristotle, the physical processes which sense organs undergo are not standard qualitative changes (i.e. alterations), but activities or the actualizations of potencies in the material constituents of living animal bodies | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJoseph M. Magee (2000). Sense Organs and the Activity of Sensation in Aristotle. Phronesis 45 (4):306-330.
J. A. Towey (1999). Aristotle on the Sense Organs (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 119:192-193.
T. K. Johansen (1997). Aristotle on the Sense-Organs. Cambridge University Press.
Robert S. Colter (2012). Thought, Perception, and Isomorphism in Aristotle's De Anima. Polish Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):27-39.
Joseph M. Magee (2003). Unmixing the Intellect: Aristotle on the Cognitive Powers and Bodily Organs. Greenwood Press.
Stephen Everson (1997). Aristotle on Perception. Oxford University Press.
John E. Sisko (1999). Sense-Organs T. K. Johansen: Aristotle on the Sense-Organs . Pp. Xvi + 304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Cased, £37.50/$59.95. ISBN: 0-521-58338-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (01):122-.
Walter A. Brogan (2002). Gadamer's Praise of Theory: Aristotle's Friend and the Reciprocity Between Theory and Practice. Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):141-155.
Robert Heinaman (2007). Actuality, Potentiality and De Anima II.5. Phronesis 52 (2):139-187.
Pavel Gregoric (2007). Aristotle on the Common Sense. Oxford University Press.
Phil Corkum (2010). Attention, Perception, and Thought in Aristotle. Dialogue 49 (02):199-222.
Christopher Byrne (2001). Matter and Aristotle's Material Cause. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):85-111.
T. Ganson (2000). Aristotle on the Sense-Organs. Philosophical Review 109 (1):89-92.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-31Total downloads3 ( #201,930 of 549,093 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
