David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):137-152 (2013)
I claim that caricature is an epistemically defective depiction. More precisely, when employed in service to some epistemic uptake, I claim that caricature can have a non-negligible epistemic effect only for a less than ideally rational audience with certain cognitive biases. An ideally rational audience, however, would take all caricature to be what I refer to as fairground caricature, i.e., an interesting or entertaining form of depiction that is at best only trivially revelatory. I then argue that any medium (or genre) substantially employing caricature (or standardly featuring or prescribing its employment) in service to some epistemic uptake is to that extent an epistemically defective medium (e.g., beliefs informed by works specific to that medium are to that extent unwarranted). I then show the editorial cartoon to be just such an epistemically defective medium.
|Keywords||Depiction Caricature Epistemic Value Misrepresentation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. L. Clarke (1967). Roman Caricature and Parody Jean-Pierre Cébe: La Caricature Et la Parodie Dans le Monde Romain Antique des Origines À Juvénal. (Bibl. Des Éc. Franç. d'Athènes Et de Rome, Fasc. 206.) Pp. 408; 19 Plates. Paris: De Boccard, 1966. Paper, 60 Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 17 (02):180-182.
Robert Guay (2007). Transcendental Elitism. International Studies in Philosophy 39 (3):163-177.
Allan Hazlett (forthcoming). Expressivism and Convention-Relativism About Epistemic Discourse. In A. Fairweather & O. Flanagan (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Rik Peels (2010). Epistemic Desiderata and Epistemic Pluralism. Journal of Philosophical Research 35 (1):193-207.
Don Fallis (2005). Epistemic Value Theory and Social Epistemology. Episteme 2 (3):177-188.
Allen W. Wood (1986). Historical Materialism and Functional Explanation. Inquiry 29 (1-4):11 – 27.
Stephanie Ross (1974). Caricature. The Monist 58 (2):285-293.
Antony Hare (2001). Russell Caricature. Inquiry 20 (2):6-6.
Alan C. Harris (1995). Just a Caricature of a Year. Semiotics:188-197.
Paul M. Hughes (1993). Persons, Caricature and Morality. International Studies in Philosophy 25 (3):47-58.
Michael A. Bishop (2000). In Praise of Epistemic Irresponsibility: How Lazy and Ignorant Can You Be? Synthese 122 (1-2):179 - 208.
Hilary Greaves & David Wallace (2006). Justifying Conditionalization: Conditionalization Maximizes Expected Epistemic Utility. Mind 115 (459):607-632.
David Kunzle (1985). Goethe and Caricature: From Hogarth to Töpffer. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 48:164-188.
Harry Malisoff (1936). Book Review:La Logique Et Sa Caricature Marcel Boll. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 3 (1):130-.
Added to index2012-07-30
Total downloads261 ( #2,289 of 1,692,523 )
Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #7,352 of 1,692,523 )
How can I increase my downloads?