David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):500-521 (2011)
In this article I elucidate a conception of small worlds, or ‘ontological’ contexts, within the curriculum that stand out and beyond the horizon of technological-scientific reality, which might be linked with forgotten, marginal ways of being and thinking. As I attempt to demonstrate, it is possible that such ontological worlds apart from technology's ‘Enframing’ effect might inspire the type of meditative thinking in our classrooms that is consistent with Heidegger's notion of authentic worldly dwelling as it appears in the later writings of the 1930s, or the ‘turn’
|Keywords||Heidegger art education technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Martin Heidegger (1967). Being and Time. Oxford, Blackwell.
Martin Heidegger (1962). Being and Time. London, Scm Press.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1990). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being in Time, Division I. A Bradford Book.
Martin Heidegger (2000). Introduction to Metaphysics. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
Matthew Kruger-Ross (2015). Raising the Question of Being in Education by Way of Heidegger's Phenomenological Ontology. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 15 (2):1-12.
Similar books and articles
James Magrini, Worlds Apart in the Curriculum: Heidegger, Technology, and the Poietic Attunement of Art.
Dana S. Belu & Andrew Feenberg (2010). Heidegger's Aporetic Ontology of Technology. Inquiry 53 (1):1-19.
Tracy Colony (2009). Concerning Technology. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):23-34.
Don Ihde (2010). Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. Fordham University Press.
Andrew Feenberg (2000). The Ontic and the Ontological in Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology: Response to Thomson. Inquiry 43 (4):445 – 450.
Iain Thomson (2000). What's Wrong with Being a Technological Essentialist? A Response to Feenberg. Inquiry 43 (4):429 – 444.
Guy Bennett-Hunter (2007). Heidegger on Philosophy and Language. Philosophical Writings 35 (2):5-16.
Hubert L. Dreyus & Charles Spinosa (1997). Highway Bridges and Feasts: Heidegger and Borgmann on How to Affirm Technology. [REVIEW] Man and World 30 (2):159-178.
Fredrik Svenaeus (2013). The Relevance of Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology for Biomedical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):1-15.
Søren Riis (2011). Towards the Origin of Modern Technology: Reconfiguring Martin Heidegger's Thinking. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):103-117.
Fred Rush (2001). The Availability of Heidegger?S Later Thought. Inquiry 44 (2):201 – 222.
Trish Glazebrook (2000). Heidegger's Philosophy of Science. Fordham University Press.
Added to index2010-12-25
Total downloads7 ( #428,141 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,378 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?