An examination of the structure of executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: A canadian investigation [Book Review]
Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):149 - 162 (2006)
|Abstract||We explore the extent to which Boards use executive compensation to incite firms to act in accordance with social and environmental objectives (e.g., Johnson, R. and D. Greening: 1999, Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 564-578; Kane, E. J.: 2002, Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 1919-1933.). We examine the association between executive compensation and corporate social responsibility (CSR) for 77 Canadian firms using three key components of executives' compensation structure: salary, bonus, and stock options. Similar to prior research (McGuire, J., S. Dow and K. Argheyd: 2003, Journal of Business Ethics 45(4), 341-359), we measure three different aspects of CSR, which include Total CSR as well as CSR Strengths and CSR Weaknesses. CSR Strengths and CSR Weaknesses capture the positive and negative aspects of CSR, respectively. We find significant positive relationships between: (1) Salary and CSR Weaknesses, (2) Bonus and CSR Strengths, (3) Stock Options and Total CSR; and (4) Stock Options and CSR Strengths. Our findings suggest the importance of the structure of executive compensation in encouraging socially responsible actions, particularly for larger Canadian firms. This in turn suggests that executive compensation can be an effective tool in aligning executives' welfare with that of the "common good", which results in more socially responsible firms (Bebchuk, L., J. Fried and D. Walker: 2002, The University of Chicago Law Review 69, 751-846; Zalewski, D.: 2003, Journal of Economic Issues 37(2), 503-509). In addition, our findings suggest the importance of institutional context in influencing the association between executive compensation and CSR. Further implications for practice and research are discussed|
|Keywords||corporate governance executive compensation social performance social responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wenjing Li & Ran Zhang (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence From China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (4):631 - 645.
Ye Cai, Hoje Jo & Carrie Pan (2011). Vice or Virtue? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Executive Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):159-173.
Ella Mae Matsumura & Jae Yong Shin (2005). Corporate Governance Reform and CEO Compensation: Intended and Unintended Consequences. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2):101 - 113.
Allan S. Ashley & Simon S. M. Yang (2004). Executive Compensation and Earnings Persistence. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):369-382.
Diana C. Robertson (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and Different Stages of Economic Development: Singapore, Turkey, and Ethiopia. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):617 - 633.
James A. Brander (2006). The Effect of Ethical Fund Portfolio Inclusion on Executive Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (4):317 - 329.
Yan Leung Cheung, Weiqiang Tan, Hee-Joon Ahn & Zheng Zhang (2010). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Matter in Asian Emerging Markets? Journal of Business Ethics 92 (3):401 - 413.
Ziva Sharp & Nurit Zaidman (2010). Strategization of Csr. Journal of Business Ethics 93 (1):51 - 71.
Won Yong Oh, Young Kyun Chang & Aleksey Martynov (2011). The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence From Korea. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):283-297.
L. S. Mahoney & Linda Thorne (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Long-Term Compensation: Evidence From Canada. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 57 (3):241 - 253.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,359 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?