Explanation and Understanding in the Human Sciences
Oxford University Press (1997)
|Abstract||Which form of explanation is adequate for the humans sciences? Mahajan argues that social reality can be perceived in different ways--hermeneutic understanding, narrative, reason action and causal explanation--and each alters our perception of reality. A new chapter on poststructuralist and postmodern theories brings this important book up-to-date with current thinking.|
|Keywords||Causation Social sciences Methodology|
|Buy the book||$5.27 used (48% off) $356.42 new Amazon page|
|Call number||BD541.M25 1992|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeroen Van Bouwel & Erik Weber (2008). De-Ontologizing the Debate on Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based on Epistemic Interests. Human Studies 31 (4).
Isaac Reed (2011). Interpretation and Social Knowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences. The University of Chicago Press.
Karsten R. Stueber (2012). Understanding Versus Explanation? How to Think About the Distinction Between the Human and the Natural Sciences. Inquiry 55 (1):17 - 32.
Peter T. Manicas (2006). A Realist Philosophy of Social Science: Explanation and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Rolf Gruner (1967). Understanding in the Social Sciences and History. Inquiry 10 (1-4):151 – 163.
Frank Cunningham (1967). More on Understanding in the Social Sciences. Inquiry 10 (1-4):321-326.
Geoffrey Hawthorn (1991). Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Harold Kincaid (2004). Contextualism, Explanation and the Social Sciences. Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):201 – 218.
James W. van Evra (1969). II. Understanding in the Social Sciences Revisited. Inquiry 12 (1-4):347-349.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?