Self-Preservation: An Argument for Therapeutic Cloning, and a Strategy for Fostering Respect for Moral Integrity
Graduate studies at Western
American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):56-66 (2004)
|Abstract||The issues of human cloning and stem cell retrieval are inseparable in circumstances in which the rationale of self-preservation may be invoked as a negative right. I apply this rationale to a hypothetical case in which cloning is necessary to preserve the bodily integrity or life of an individual. Self-preservation as moral integrity is examined in a narrower context, i.e., as applicable to those for whom deliberate termination of embryonic life is morally-problematic. This issue is addressed through comparison with two paradigms commonly used in support of clinical practice: the distinction between letting die and killing, and the permissibility of vital organ retrieval after death. Although these paradigms are questionable in their own right, they offer a rationale by which scientists and clinicians may respect the negative right to moral integrity of those with whom they disagree|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
S. Camporesi & L. Bortolotti (2008). Reproductive Cloning in Humans and Therapeutic Cloning in Primates: Is the Ethical Debate Catching Up with the Recent Scientific Advances? Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e15-e15.
Hossam E. Fadel (2012). Developments in Stem Cell Research and Therapeutic Cloning: Islamic Ethical Positions, a Review. Bioethics 26 (3):128-135.
Gerald R. Winslow (1991). Integrity and Compromise in Nursing Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):307-323.
Alistair Brown (2010). Therapeutic Cloning: The Ethical Road to Regulation - Part II: Analysing the UK Position. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):60-73.
Andrea Bonnicksen (2007). Pt. V. Reproduction and Cloning. Abortion Revisited / Don Marquis ; Moral Status, Moral Value, and Human Embryos: Implications for Stem Cell Research / Bonnie Steinbock ; Therapeutic Cloning: Politics and Policy. [REVIEW] In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Marilyn E. Coors (2002). Therapeutic Cloning: From Consequences to Contradiction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (3):297 – 317.
Greg Scherkoske (2010). Integrity and Moral Danger. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (3):335-358.
C. F. Gethmann & F. Thiele (2001). Moral Arguments Against the Cloning of Humans. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (1):35-46.
Greg Scherkoske (2013). Whither Integrity I: Recent Faces of Integrity. Philosophy Compass 8 (1):28-39.
Sandra Shapshay (2012). Procreative Liberty, Enhancement and Commodification in the Human Cloning Debate. Health Care Analysis 20 (4):356-366.
Gerard Magill (2006). Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Human Therapeutic Cloning : Maintaining the Ethical Tension Between Respect and Research. In Ana Smith Iltis (ed.), Research Ethics. Routledge.
Samuel Mejías Valbuena (2005). Philosophical, Scientist, Moral, Ethics and Religious Analysis in the Juridical Compared Science in the Law of Cloning. S. Mejías Valbuena.
Norman Ford (2007). Stop Press: Human Cloning Bill in Victorian Parliament. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (3):12.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads11 ( #107,689 of 749,901 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,995 of 749,901 )
How can I increase my downloads?