David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Spontaneous Generations 6 (1):75-89 (2012)
This article tracks the historical emergence of a new visual convention in the representation of the risks associated with climate change. The “reasons for concern” or “burning embers” diagram has become a prominent visual element of the climate change debate. By drawing on a number of cultural resources, the image has gained a level of discursive power which has resulted both in material mobility and epistemic transformation as the diagram itself has become a tool for a variety of actors to reason with. The case brings to light a number of challenges associated with attempts to know and visualize abstract concepts such as risk and danger, including the social organisation of knowledge production and the role of expert judgment in contexts where science is asked to retreat from normativity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Adam Pautz (2006). Can the Physicalist Explain Colour Structure in Terms of Colour Experience? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):535 – 564.
Susan I. Rotroff (2010). Sardis (N.D.) Cahill (Ed.) Love for Lydia. A Sardis Anniversary Volume Presented to Crawford H. Greenewalt, Jr. (Archaeological Exploration of Sardis Report 4.) Pp. Xvi + 250, B/W & Colour Ills, Maps, Colour Pls. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2008. Cased, £37.95, €45, US$50. ISBN: 978-0-674-03195-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (01):263-.
John Kadvany (1997). Varieties of Risk Representations. Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
Tine Wilde (2002). The 4th Dimension. Wittgenstein on Colour and Imagination. In Christian Kanzian, Josef Quitterer & Edmund Runggaldier (eds.), Persons. An Interdisciplinary Approach. Papers of the 25th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. 284-286.
Joel Katzav, Henk A. Dijkstra & A. T. J. de Laat (2012). Assessing Climate Model Projections: State of the Art and Philosophical Reflections. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 43 (4):258-276.
Jonathan Ellis (2005). Colour Irrealism and the Formation of Colour Concepts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):53-73.
J. van Brakel (2005). Colour is a Culturalist Category. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):507-508.
Yasmina Jraissati, Elley Wakui, Lieven Decock & Igor Douven (2012). Constraints on Colour Category Formation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):171-196.
Harris Wofford (1970). Embers of the World. Santa Barbara, Calif.,Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.
Glyn W. Humphreys & M. Jane Riddoch (1999). Disorder of Colour Consciousness: The View From Neuropsychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):956-957.
Bernard Harrison (1967). On Describing Colors. Inquiry 10 (1-4):38-52.
Peter H. Spader (1985). The Embers and the Stars. Review of Metaphysics 38 (4):888-889.
John Morrison (2012). Colour in a Physical World: A Problem Due to Visual Noise. Mind 121 (482):333-373.
John Sutton (2001). Review of Don Dedrick, Naming the Rainbow: Colour Language, Colour Science, and Culture. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review/ Comptes Rendus Philosophiques:106-109.
Added to index2012-10-04
Total downloads6 ( #290,652 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #246,076 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?