Particles and the Perversely Philosophical Schoolchild: Rigid Designation, Haecceitism and Statistics
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Teorema 17 (1):75-87 (1998)
In this paper, I want to draw attention to a connection between rigid designation with its consequence that we are able to stipulate worlds and haecceitism, the doctrine that we have possible worlds alike in all qualitative features which nonetheless are metaphysically different, in that two individuals can have all their qualitative features swapped while remaining the same individuals. I shall argue that stipulation leads to haecceitism, which in turn depends upon commitment to haecceity ("primitive thisness"). Haecceitism is, I claim, an unattractive doctrine, but there is one powerful argument for it, drawn from the desire to make sense of observed frequencies of probabilistic events in terms of possible configurations of phase spaces which may be taken to be a form of possible world. However, by paying close attention to classical and quantum statistics, we see that this argument fails
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brad Skow (2008). Haecceitism, Anti-Haecceitism, and Possible Worlds: A Case Study. Philosophical Quarterly 58:97-107.
Alessandro Torza (2011). A Characterization of Haecceitism. Analytic Philosophy 52 (4):262-266.
Michael P. Wolf (2006). Rigid Designation and Anaphoric Theories of Reference. Philosophical Studies 130 (2):351 - 375.
Gregg A. Ten Elshof (2000). A Defense of Moderate Haecceitism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 60:55-74.
Bradford Skow (2008). Haecceitism, Anti-Haecceitism and Possible Worlds. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):98-107.
Arthur Sullivan (2005). Rigid Designation, Direct Reference, and Modal Metaphysics. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):577–599.
Arthur Sullivan (2007). Rigid Designation and Semantic Structure. Philosophers' Imprint 7 (6):1-22.
Sam Cowling (2012). Haecceitism for Modal Realists. Erkenntnis 77 (3):399-417.
Bradley Franks & Nick Braisby (1998). What is the Point? Concepts, Description, and Rigid Designation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):70-70.
Delia Graff Fara (2009). Dear Haecceitism. Erkenntnis 70 (3):285 - 297.
Delia Graff Fara (2009). Dear Haecceitism. Erkenntnis 70 (3):285–297.
Joseph LaPorte (2006). Rigid Designators for Properties. Philosophical Studies 130 (2):321 - 336.
Bruce L. Gordon (2002). Maxwell–Boltzmann Statistics and the Metaphysics of Modality. Synthese 133 (3):393 - 417.
John O'Leary-Hawthorne & J. A. Cover (1996). Haecceitism and Anti-Haecceitism in Leibniz's Philosophy. Noûs 30 (1):1-30.
Added to index2010-11-17
Total downloads24 ( #76,896 of 1,102,044 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,864 of 1,102,044 )
How can I increase my downloads?