David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 83 (3):385 - 400 (1990)
I reject the widely held view that Duhem's 1906 book La Théorie physique is a statement of instrumentalistic conventionalism, motivated by the scientific crisis at the end of the nineteenth century. By considering Duhem's historical context I show that his epistemological views were already formed before the crisis occured; that he consistently supported general thermodynamics against the new atomism; and that he rejected the epistemological views of the latter's philosophical supporters. In particular I show that Duhem rejected Poincaré's account of scientific language, Le Roy's view that laws are definitions, and the conventionalist's use of simplicity as the criterion of theory choice. Duhem regarded most theory choices as decidable on empirical grounds, but made historical context the main determining factor in scientific change.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roger Ariew & Peter Barker (1986). Duhem on Maxwell: A Case-Study in the Interrelations of History of Science and Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:145 - 156.
Martin J. Klein (1954). Book Review:The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory Pierre Duhem, P. P. Wiener. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 21 (4):354-.
Richard M. Burian (1990). Maiocchi on Duhem, Howard on Duhem and Einstein: Historiographical Comments. Synthese 83 (3):401 - 408.
André Goddu (1990). The Realism That Duhem Rejected in Copernicus. Synthese 83 (2):301 - 315.
P. Needham (1998). Duhem's Physicalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (1):33-62.
Ernan McMullin (1990). Comment: Duhem's Middle Way. Synthese 83 (3):421 - 430.
Michael J. Crowe (1990). Duhem and History and Philosophy of Mathematics. Synthese 83 (3):431 - 447.
Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem (1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
K. M. Darling (2002). The Complete Duhemian Underdetermination Argument: Scientific Language and Practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):511-533.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads51 ( #25,874 of 1,010,827 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,700 of 1,010,827 )
How can I increase my downloads?