Sophia 46 (3) (2007)
|Abstract||According to Michael Almeida and Graham Oppy, adherents of skeptical theism will find their sense of moral obligation undermined in a potentially ‘appalling’ way. Michael Bergmann and Michael Rea disagree, claiming that God’s commands provide skeptical theists with a source of moral obligation that withstands the skepticism in skeptical theism. I argue that Bergmann and Rea are mistaken: skeptical theists cannot consistently rely on what they take to be God’s commands.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Justin P. McBrayer (2012). Are Skeptical Theists Really Skeptics? Sometimes Yes and Sometimes No. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (1):3-16.
Ian Wilks (2009). Skeptical Theism and Empirical Unfalsifiability. Faith and Philosophy 26 (1):64-76.
Scott Sehon (forthcoming). The Problem of Evil: Skeptical Theism Leads to Moral Paralysis. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
Brian Ribeiro & Scott Aikin (forthcoming). Skeptical Theism, Moral Skepticism, and Divine Commands. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 1.
William Hasker (2010). All Too Skeptical Theism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):15-29.
Justin P. McBrayer (2010). Skeptical Theism. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):611-623.
Stephen Maitzen (2009). Skeptical Theism and Moral Obligation. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):93 - 103.
Graham Oppy (2005). Evidential Arguments From Evil and Skeptical Theism. Philo 8 (2):84-94.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #34,138 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?