Technikbewertung als Instrument der politischen Gestaltung. �ber die Steuerbarkeit moderner Gesellschaften
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):197-209 (2003)
The concept of technology assessment emerged at the end of the 1960s. It was based on the consideration that state agents, and parliaments in particular, dispose of information on the risks of new technologies and large-scale technical systems in order to be able to arrive at well-founded decisions. Today, the idea of technology assessment, which not by coincidence arose in the phase of control optimism, appears to be off the political agenda, to a large extent, as an expression of instrumentally-rational action in the domain of technology. However, the dominant role of technology in social transformation, as described by many sociological classics, has by no means diminished. The following paper outlines the connections between the instrument of technology assessment and the question of controllability. It is shown that the idea of technology assessment relies on largely obsolete assumptions about the ability of states to exercise control. Technology assessment adapted to modern conditions cannot be an exclusive function of the state, but must be devolved to and institutionalized with all agents concerned with the shaping of new technologies
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anne Chapman (2004). Technology as World Building. Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1 & 2):59 – 72.
Barbara Skorupinski (2002). Putting Precaution to Debate – About the Precautionary Principle and Participatory Technology Assessment. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (1):87-102.
Thomas Saretzki (2012). Legitimation Problems of Participatory Processes in Technology Assessment and Technology Policy. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):7-26.
Cassandra L. Pinnick (1996). Epistemology of Technology Assessment. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (1):14-18.
Karen Kastenhofer (2010). Do We Need a Specific Kind of Technoscience Assessment? Taking the Convergence of Science and Technology Seriously. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):37-54.
G. J. van Der Wilt (2004). Health Technology Assessment: Trying to Bring Empirical and Ethical Inquiry Together. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 2 (2-3):195-206.
Armin Grunwald (1994). Wissenschaftstheoretische Anmerkungen Zur Technikfolgenabschätzung: Die Prognose- Und Quantifizierungsproblematik. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 25 (1):51 - 70.
R. P. B. Reuzel, G. J. van der Wilt, H. A. M. J. ten Have & P. F. Vries Robdeb (2001). Interactive Technology Assessment and Wide Reflective Equilibrium. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):245 – 261.
Gert Jan van der Wilt, Rob Reuzel & H. David Banta (2000). The Ethics of Assessing Health Technologies. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):101-113.
David Wright (2011). A Framework for the Ethical Impact Assessment of Information Technology. Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):199-226.
Hans Oberdiek (1990). Technology: Autonomous or Neutral. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):67 – 77.
Rob Reuzel (2004). Interactive Technology Assessment of Paediatric Cochlear Implantation. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):119-137.
Zbigniew Szawarski (1989). Dignity and Technology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):243-249.
Nick Peim & Kevin J. Flint (2009). Testing Times: Questions Concerning Assessment for School Improvement. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (3):342-361.
Alfred Driessen (2009). Ethical Aspects of Research in Ultrafast Communication. In Paul Sollie & Marcus Düwell (eds.), Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technology Developments. Springer
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads2 ( #653,184 of 1,789,736 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,435 of 1,789,736 )
How can I increase my downloads?