Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia 34 (4):453-464 (2006)
|Abstract||According to global skepticism, we know nothing. According to local skepticism, we know nothing in some particular area or domain of discourse. Unlike their global counterparts, local skeptics think they can contain our invincible ignorance within limited bounds. I argue that they are mistaken. Local skepticism, particularly the kinds that most often get defended, cannot stay local: if there are domains whose truths we cannot know, then there must be claims outside those domains that we cannot know even if they are true. My argument focuses on one popular form of local skepticism, ethical skepticism, but I believe that the argument generalizes to cover other forms as well.|
|Keywords||Skepticism Local skepticism Moral skepticism Epistemic closure Philosophical taxonomy Barry Stroud CharlesLandesman Epistemology Knowledge Nihilism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alan Strudler (2008). Confucian Skepticism About Workplace Rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):67-83.
Charlotte L. Stough (1969). Greek Skepticism; a Study in Epistemology. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Christine M. Korsgaard (1986). Skepticism About Practical Reason. Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):5-25.
Brian Ribeiro (2002). Epistemological Skepticism(s) and Rational Self-Control. The Monist 85 (3):468-477.
Linton Wang & Oliver Tai (2010). Skeptical Conclusions. Erkenntnis 72 (2):177 - 204.
Paul Kurtz (2010). Exuberant Skepticism. Prometheus Books 59 John Glenn Drive.
Bradford Skow (2008). Local and Global Relativity Principles. Philosophers' Imprint 8 (10):1-14.
Diego E. Machuca (2006). The Local Nature of Modern Moral Skepticism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):315–324.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #23,340 of 751,991 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #6,713 of 751,991 )
How can I increase my downloads?