David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):339-348 (2000)
David Hull has demonstrated a marvelous ability to annoy everyone who caresabout science (or should), by forcing us to confront deep truths about howscience works. Credit, priority, precularities, and process weave together tomake the very fabric of science. As Hull's studies reveal, the story is bothmessier and more irritating than those limited by a single disciplinaryperspective generally admit. By itself history is interesting enough, andphilosophy valuable enough. But taken together, they do so much in tellingus about science and by puncturing the comfortable popular illusion abouthow science works. Ultimately, David Hull shows by his example thathistory and philosophy of science can make science better. I agree, and withits focus on the history of science in particular, this paper explores why.
|Keywords||historiography of science interdisciplinary studies scientific change|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Todd A. Grantham (2000). Evolutionary Epistemology, Social Epistemology, and the Demic Structure of Science. Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):443-463.
David L. Hull (2001). Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge University Press.
Rachel Laudan (1992). The 'New' History of Science: Implications for Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:476 - 481.
Michael R. Matthews (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
N. Tosh (2003). Anachronism and Retrospective Explanation: In Defence of a Present-Centred History of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):647-659.
A. Cornelius Benjamin (1960). Is the Philosophy of Science Scientific? Philosophy of Science 27 (4):351-358.
John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Taner Edis (2006). Science and Nonbelief. Greenwood Press.
K. Brad Wray (2000). Invisible Hands and the Success of Science. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):163-175.
David L. Hull (2000). The Professionalization of Science Studies: Cutting Some Slack. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 15 (1):61-91.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #91,916 of 1,139,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #165,020 of 1,139,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?