Asian Philosophy 17 (3):231 – 249 (2007)
|Abstract||In this paper I attempt to understand the implications of akara's claim that liberation is not an action. If liberation is not an action, how is it up to us and therefore our responsibility? What role do actions have in a life concerned with liberation? The key to understanding akara's view, I suggest, requires broad reflection on his claim in his commentary on Brahma Stra I.1.4 that cessation of action in accordance with Vedic prohibition is not an action. I will conclude by discussing the implications of this interpretation on the nature of māyā in akara.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jing Zhu (2004). Passive Action and Causalism. Philosophical Studies 119 (3):295-314.
Carl Ginet (1990). On Action. Cambridge University Press.
Herbert Marcuse (1969). An Essay on Liberation. Boston, Beacon Press.
David Burton (2002). Knowledge and Liberation: Philosophical Ruminations on a Buddhist Conundrum. Philosophy East and West 52 (3):326-345.
David F. Burton (2002). Knowledge and Liberation: Philosophical Ruminations on a Buddhist Conundrum. Philosophy East and West 52 (3):326-345.
Kenneth Surin (2009). Freedom Not Yet: Liberation and the Next World Order. Duke University Press.
John Taber (2010). Kumārila's Buddhist. Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):279-296.
David Lamb (1982). Animal Rights and Liberation Movements. Environmental Ethics 4 (3):215-233.
Roopen Majithia (2007). Śaṇkara on Action and Liberation. Asian Philosophy 17 (3):231-249.
William Rehg (1996). Critique, Action, and Liberation. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (3):359-360.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #53,739 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?