Asian Philosophy 17 (3):231-249 (2007)
|Abstract||In this paper I attempt to understand the implications of a kara's claim that liberation is not an action. If liberation is not an action, how is it up to us and therefore our responsibility? What role do actions have in a life concerned with liberation? The key to understanding a kara's view, I suggest, requires broad reflection on his claim in his commentary on Brahma S tra I.1.4 that cessation of action in accordance with Vedic prohibition is not an action. I will conclude by discussing the implications of this interpretation on the nature of m y in a kara|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven Hendley (1997). James L. Marsh: Critique, Action, and Liberation. Man and World 30 (1):122-126.
William Rehg (1996). Critique, Action, and Liberation. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (3):359-360.
Jing Zhu (2004). Passive Action and Causalism. Philosophical Studies 119 (3):295-314.
Herbert Marcuse (1969). An Essay on Liberation. Boston, Beacon Press.
Carl Ginet (1990). On Action. Cambridge University Press.
David F. Burton (2002). Knowledge and Liberation: Philosophical Ruminations on a Buddhist Conundrum. Philosophy East and West 52 (3):326-345.
David Burton (2002). Knowledge and Liberation: Philosophical Ruminations on a Buddhist Conundrum. Philosophy East and West 52 (3):326-345.
Kenneth Surin (2009). Freedom Not Yet: Liberation and the Next World Order. Duke University Press.
David Lamb (1982). Animal Rights and Liberation Movements. Environmental Ethics 4 (3):215-233.
Roopen Majithia (2007). Akara on Action and Liberation. Asian Philosophy 17 (3):231 – 249.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads6 ( #145,547 of 549,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,060 )
How can I increase my downloads?