David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 5 (2):147-163 (2010)
The article presents Frege's distinction between Sense and Reference. After a short introduction, it explains the puzzle which gave rise to the distinction; Frege's earlier solution, and his reasons for its later repudiation. The distinction, which embodies Frege's second solution, is then discussed in two phases. The first, which is restricted to proper names, sets out its most basic features. The second discusses 'empty' names; indirect speech, and the distinction for predicates and for complete sentences. Finally, two criticisms, by Russell and by Kripke, are briefly set out.
|Keywords||Frege Sense Reference Russell|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gilead Bar-Elli (2006). Identity in Frege's Begriffsschrift: Where Both Thau-Caplan and Heck Are Wrong. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (3):355-370.
Michael A. E. Dummett (1981). The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Gareth Evans (1982). Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
Gottlob Frege (1991). Posthumous Writings. Wiley-Blackwell.
Citations of this work BETA
Palle Leth (2013). On Frege's Notion of Predicate Reference. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (4):335 - 350.
Similar books and articles
Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1986). On Frege's Two Notions of Sense. History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (1):31-41.
Carlo Penco (2003). Frege: Two Theses, Two Senses. History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (2):87-109.
Tim Crane (1992). Names, Sense and Kripke’s Puzzle. From the Logical Point of View 2:11-26.
Kevin C. Klement (2001). Russell's Paradox in Appendix B of the Principles of Mathematics : Was Frege's Response Adequate? History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (1):13-28.
Wolfgang Carl (1994). Frege's Theory of Sense and Reference: Its Origins and Scope. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Kremer (2010). Sense and Reference: The Origins and Development of the Distinction. In Tom Ricketts & Michael D. Potter (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Frege. Cambridge University Press. 220--292.
Michael Nelson (2008). Frege and the Paradox of Analysis. Philosophical Studies 137 (2):159 - 181.
Mark Textor (2009). Unsaturatedness: Wittgenstein's Challenge, Frege's Answer. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt1):61-82.
Saul A. Kripke (2008). Frege's Theory of Sense and Reference: Some Exegetical Notes. Theoria 74 (3):181-218.
Added to index2010-02-11
Total downloads247 ( #1,643 of 1,100,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)22 ( #6,543 of 1,100,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?