Input/output logics
Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (4):383-408 (2000)
| Abstract | In a range of contexts, one comes across processes resembling inference, but where input propositions are not in general included among outputs, and the operation is not in any way reversible. Examples arise in contexts of conditional obligations, goals, ideals, preferences, actions, and beliefs. Our purpose is to develop a theory of such input/output operations. Four are singled out: simple-minded, basic (making intelligent use of disjunctive inputs), simple-minded reusable (in which outputs may be recycled as inputs), and basic reusable. They are defined semantically and characterised by derivation rules, as well as in terms of relabeling procedures and modal operators. Their behaviour is studied on both semantic and syntactic levels. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMark E. Pflieger (2000). Brain Function Theories, EEG Sources, and Dynamic States. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):411-412.
Muhammad Ali Khalidi (2007). Innate Cognitive Capacities. Mind and Language 22 (1):92-115.
Norman Y. Foo & Pavlos Peppas (2001). Realization for Causal Nondeterministic Input-Output Systems. Studia Logica 67 (3):419-437.
David Makinson & Leendert van der Torre (2003). Permission From an Input/Output Perspective. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (4):391-416.
David Makinson & Leendert van der Torre (2001). Constraints for Input/Output Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (2):155-185.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,124 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
