David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (4):383-408 (2000)
In a range of contexts, one comes across processes resembling inference, but where input propositions are not in general included among outputs, and the operation is not in any way reversible. Examples arise in contexts of conditional obligations, goals, ideals, preferences, actions, and beliefs. Our purpose is to develop a theory of such input/output operations. Four are singled out: simple-minded, basic (making intelligent use of disjunctive inputs), simple-minded reusable (in which outputs may be recycled as inputs), and basic reusable. They are defined semantically and characterised by derivation rules, as well as in terms of relabeling procedures and modal operators. Their behaviour is studied on both semantic and syntactic levels.
|Keywords||input/output logic reusability identity conditional goals conditional obligations deontic logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ray Reiter (1980). A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13:81-137.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter B. M. Vranas (2008). New Foundations for Imperative Logic I: Logical Connectives, Consistency, and Quantifiers. Noûs 42 (4):529-572.
Gregory Wheeler & Marco Alberti (2011). NO Revision and NO Contraction. Minds and Machines 21 (3):411-430.
Guido Governatori, Francesco Olivieri, Antonino Rotolo & Simone Scannapieco (2013). Computing Strong and Weak Permissions in Defeasible Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (6):799-829.
Audun Stolpe (2010). Norm-System Revision: Theory and Application. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (3):247-283.
Guido Boella & Leendert van der Torre (2008). Institutions with a Hierarchy of Authorities in Distributed Dynamic Environments. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (1):53-71.
Similar books and articles
Mark E. Pflieger (2000). Brain Function Theories, EEG Sources, and Dynamic States. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):411-412.
Muhammad Ali Khalidi (2007). Innate Cognitive Capacities. Mind and Language 22 (1):92-115.
Norman Y. Foo & Pavlos Peppas (2001). Realization for Causal Nondeterministic Input-Output Systems. Studia Logica 67 (3):419-437.
David Makinson & Leendert van der Torre (2003). Permission From an Input/Output Perspective. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (4):391-416.
David Makinson & Leendert van der Torre (2001). Constraints for Input/Output Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (2):155-185.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads162 ( #15,653 of 1,781,467 )
Recent downloads (6 months)112 ( #8,445 of 1,781,467 )
How can I increase my downloads?