European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):385-413 (2010)
|Abstract||Abstract: Kant declares the judgment of beauty to be neither ‘objective’ nor ‘merely subjective’. This essay takes up the question of what this might mean and whether it can be taken seriously. It is often supposed that Kant's denials of ‘objectivity’ to the judgment of beauty express a rejection of realism about beauty. I suggest that Kant's thought is not to be understood in these terms—that it does not properly belong in the arena of debates about the constituents of ‘reality’—motivating the suggestion by first considering a pair of opposing views on the question of whether Kant can be understood to develop a real alternative to realism about beauty at all|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alexander Rueger (2008). The Free Play of the Faculties and the Status of Natural Beauty in Kant's Theory of Taste. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (3).
Rachel Zuckert (2007). Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Christian Helmut Wenzel (2009). Kant's Aesthetics: Overview and Recent Literature. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):380-406.
Raphael Bexten, Is Beauty a Pure Perfection? Sammelpunkt. Elektronisch Archivierte Theorie.
Albert Hofstadter (1975). Kant's Aesthetic Revolution. Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (2):171 - 191.
Ted Cohen (2002). Three Problems in Kant's Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):1-12.
Rachel Zuckert (2005). Boring Beauty and Universal Morality: Kant on the Ideal of Beauty. Inquiry 48 (2):107 – 130.
María Del Rosario Acosta López (2007). Beauty as an Encounter Between Freedom and Nature. Epoché 12 (1):63-92.
Added to index2009-04-17
Total downloads79 ( #10,199 of 556,747 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,754 of 556,747 )
How can I increase my downloads?