A no-go theorem about rotation in relativity theory
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Within the framework of general relativity, in some cases at least, it is a delicate and interesting question just what it means to say that an extended body is or is not "rotating". It is so for two reasons. First, one can easily think of different criteria of rotation. Though they agree if the background spacetime structure is sufficiently simple, they do not do so in general. Second, none of the criteria fully answers to our classical intuitions. Each one exhibits some feature or other that violates those intuitions in a significant and interesting way. The principal goal of the paper is to make the second claim precise in the form of a modest no-go theorem.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Roger Jones (1980). Is General Relativity Generally Relativistic? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 381.
John Byron Manchak (2008). Is Prediction Possible in General Relativity? Foundations of Physics 38 (4):317-321.
J. Butterfield (2006). The Rotating Discs Argument Defeated. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):1-45.
Jeremy Butterfield (2006). The Rotating Discs Argument Defeated. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):1-45.
Pierre Kerszberg (1987). The Relativity of Rotation in the Early Foundations of General Relativity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18 (1):53-79.
Dagfinn Føllesdal (2001). Relativity, Rotation and Rigidity. Erkenntnis 54 (1):31-38.
David Malament (1985). A Modest Remark About Reichenbach, Rotation, and General Relativity. Philosophy of Science 52 (4):615-620.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,741 of 753,965 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?