David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Analytica 19 (33):31-44 (2004)
In this article, I discuss Hawthorne's contextualist solution to Benacerraf's dilemma. He wants to find a satisfactory epistemology to go with realist ontology, namely with causally inaccessible mathematical and modal entities. I claim that he is unsuccessful. The contextualist theories of knowledge attributions were primarily developed as a response to the skeptical argument based on the deductive closure principle. Hawthorne uses the same strategy in his attempt to solve the epistemologist puzzle facing the proponents of mathematical and modal realism, but this problem is of a different nature than the skeptical one. The contextualist theory of knowledge attributions cannot help us with the question about the nature of mathematical and modal reality and how they can be known. I further argue that Hawthorne's account does not say anything about a priori status of mathematical and modal knowledge. Later, Hawthorne adds to his account an implausible claim that in some contexts a gettierized belief counts as knowledge.
|Keywords||epistemological contextualism a priori knowledge Benacerraf’s dilemma John Hawthorne|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) (1989). Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Usa.
John Hawthorne (2003). Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford University Press.
Stewart Cohen (1999). Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (s13):57-89.
Stewart Cohen (1988). How to Be a Fallibilist. Philosophical Perspectives 2:91-123.
Paul Benacerraf (1973). Mathematical Truth. Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philip Kitcher (2000). A Priori Knowledge Revisited. In Paul Boghossian & Christopher Peacocke (eds.), New Essays on the a Priori. Oxford Up
Sonia Roca-Royes (2011). Modal Knowledge and Counterfactual Knowledge. Logique Et Analyse 54 (216):537-552.
Mark Balaguer (1995). A Platonist Epistemology. Synthese 103 (3):303 - 325.
Cian Dorr (2012). De Re A Priori Knowledge. Mind 120 (480):939-991.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2008). A New Definition of A Priori Knowledge: In Search of a Modal Basis. Metaphysica 9 (2):57-68.
Andrej Ule (2004). Scepticism, Context and Modal Reasoning. Acta Analytica 19 (33):9-30.
Terry F. Godlove (2011). Hanna, Kantian Non-Conceptualism, and Benacerraf's Dilemma. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):447 - 464.
Michael Potter (2007). What is the Problem of Mathematical Knowledge? In Michael Potter, Mary Leng & Alexander Paseau (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge.
Dale Jacquette (2006). Applied Mathematics in the Sciences. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):237-267.
Audrey Yap (2009). Logical Structuralism and Benacerraf's Problem. Synthese 171 (1):157 - 173.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads56 ( #81,602 of 1,939,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #55,208 of 1,939,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?