David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Process Studies 39 (1):129-148 (2010)
The doctrine of inerrant divine “middle knowledge” of future contingent events, first developed by the sixteenth century Jesuit theologian Luis de Molina, has resurfaced as a prominent position within contemporary debates over divine foreknowledge, creaturely freedom, and the ontological status of possibilities. As yet, the only substantive response to the new Molinism from a process perspective has come in a brief section on “Hartshorne and the Challenge of Molinism,” in an essay on Hartshorne’s view of “The Logic of Future Contingents” by George W. Shields and Donald W. Viney, in Shields’ edited anthology Process and Analysis.Shields and Viney offer an insightful critique of Molinism. However, their use of Hartshorne’s understanding of possibility presents problems for those, like me, who prefer Whitehead’s more robustly realist notion of eternal objects. Here, I defend Whitehead’s Platonism from the main lines of criticism leveled against itby Hartshorne, while demonstrating that a “thick” conception of the objective content of the possible within the context of the divine understanding need not crossover into a deterministic conception of God’s foreknowledge, à la Molina
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
George W. Shields (2010). Eternal Objects, Middle Knowledge, and Hartshorne. Process Studies 39 (1):149-165.
Derek Malone-France (2004). George W. Shields (Ed.), Process and Analysis: Whitehead, Hartshorne, and the Analytic Tradition. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (1):57-60.
Christopher J. Kosciuk, Human Freedom in a World Full of Providence: An Ockhamist-Molinist Account of the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Creaturely Free Will.
Bryant Keeling (2008). Hartshorne's Process Theism and Big Bang Cosmology Revisited. Process Studies 37 (1):92-103.
Donald A. Crosby (2010). Emergentism, Perspectivism, and Divine Pathos. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (3):196-206.
Edgar A. Towne (2011). The Divine Transcendence and Relation to Evil in Hartshorne's Dipolar Theism. The Pluralist 6 (1):196-198.
George W. Shields (2003). Omniscience and Radical Particularity: A Reply to Simoni. Religious Studies 39 (2):225-233.
Daniel A. Dombrowski (2004). Divine Beauty: The Aesthetics of Charles Hartshorne. Vanderbilt University Press.
Daniel Dombrowski (2013). Charles Hartshorne, Creative Experiencing: A Philosophy of Freedom Ed. By Donald Viney Et Al. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (3):394-396.
Alfred J. Freddoso (ed.) (1988). On Divine Foreknowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Charles Hartshorne & L. Bryant Keeling (1993). Hartshorne's Response. Process Studies 22 (3):172-172.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads9 ( #363,552 of 1,906,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?