David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):335-353 (2001)
The aim of this paper is twofold. Firstly, I give a brief account of the history of the debate on the problem of defining disposition concepts from its beginning in the late 1920s until today. This account is divided into four parts, corresponding with sections 2 to 5 of the paper, each of which deals with a major period of the debate. Section 2 reports up to the mid-1950s. Section 3 deals with important contributions to the discussion between 1955 and 1958. However, the progress made around that time was far ahead of the logical theory and techniques which were needed for foundational reasons and for a better understanding of the basic notions. Some logical techniques appropriate for that aim were developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Though not uncontroversial, those logical techniques resulted in improvements of the insights gained in the mid-1950s; I shall report on those logical techniques and their application to the problem of defining disposition concepts in Section 4. In the early 1990s, however, the whole tradition of defining disposition concepts in terms of conditionals has been challenged by some strong counter-examples which are treated in Section 5. Finally, the second of the aims of this paper is explored in Section 6, in which I sketch very briefly the current stage of the debate by discussing and evaluating the most recent approaches to the subject.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Malet Armstrong (1969). Dispositions Are Causes. Analysis 30 (1):23-26.
J. Berg (1955). On Defining Dispositional Predicates. Analysis 15 (4):85-89.
Jan Berg (1960). Some Problems Concerning Disposition Concepts. Theoria 26 (1):3--16.
Alexander Bird (1998). Dispositions and Antidotes. Philosophical Quarterly 48 (191):227-234.
Arthur W. Burks (1955). Dispositional Statements. Philosophy of Science 22 (3):175-193.
Citations of this work BETA
Markus Schrenk (2010). The Powerlessness of Necessity. Noûs 44 (4):725-739.
Joel Press (2009). Physical Explanations and Biological Explanations, Empirical Laws and a Priori Laws. Biology and Philosophy 24 (3):359-374.
Similar books and articles
Peter N. Miller (1994). Defining the Common Good: Empire, Religion, and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge University Press.
Leonard Kahn (2011). Moral Blameworthiness and the Reactive Attitudes. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):131-142.
John Turri (2009). An Infinitist Account of Doxastic Justification. Dialectica 63 (2):209-218.
Peter Schroeder-Heister (2006). Validity Concepts in Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Synthese 148 (3):525 - 571.
Gregor Damschen, Robert Schnepf & Karsten Stueber (eds.) (2009). Debating Dispositions. Issues in Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Mind. de Gruyter.
Wolfgang Spohn (2002). Lehrer Meets Ranking Theory. In Erik J. Olsson (ed.), The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer. Kluwer.
Benjamin Schnieder (2006). Troubles with Truth-Making: Necessitation and Projection. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 64 (1):61-74.
Herbert Heidelberger (1963). Knowledge, Certainty and Probability. Inquiry 6 (1-4):242 – 250.
Matteo Turilli, Antonino Vaccaro & Mariarosaria Taddeo (2012). Internet Neutrality: Ethical Issues in the Internet Environment. Philosophy and Technology 25 (2):133-151.
Fred Wilson (1985). I. Addis on Analysing Disposition Concepts. Inquiry 28 (1-4):247-260.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #64,557 of 1,101,623 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #81,804 of 1,101,623 )
How can I increase my downloads?