Direct perception
Philosophical Quarterly 3 (October):301-316 (1953)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | After-image Description Epistemology Incorrigibility Perception Moore | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert Hanna (1993). Direct Reference, Direct Perception, and the Cognitive Theory of Demonstratives. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2):96-117.
Irving Thalberg (1965). Looks, Impressions and Incorrigibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25 (March):365-374.
D. D. Todd (1975). Direct Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 35 (March):352-362.
D. D. Todd (1977). Response to Sapontzis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (June):566-568.
John Knox (1969). The Problems of Perception. Personalist 50:254-267.
James D. Carney (1962). Was Moore Talking Nonsense in 1918? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (June):521-527.
Michael Huemer (2001). Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. Lanham: Rowman &Amp; Littlefield.
Douglas J. McDermid (2001). What is Direct Perceptual Knowledge? A Fivefold Confusion. Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):1-16.
Lambert Wiesing (2011). Pause of Participation. On the Function of Artificial Presence. Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):238-252.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads37 ( #31,833 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
