In which sense can we talk about a dialogue between the sciences? An essay concerning the new sciences of complexity
|Abstract||A dialogue between the exact, the physical and the natural sciences along with the social and human sciences is both possible and necessary. The place where such a dialogue is truly prosperous is the one of the new sciences of complexity. However, with the study of complex systems, the very traditional status of the sciences changesdramatically.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Joseph Margolis (2011). Toward a Theory of Human History. Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (3-4):245-273.
Not By Me (1992). Mathematics in the Biological Sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):241 – 248.
Ricardo Waizbort (2004). Objectivity in Social Science: Toward a Hermeneutical Evolutionary Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):151-162.
Brian Fay (2006). For Science in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):227-240.
Kevin de Laplante, Certainty and Domain-Independence in the Sciences of Complexity: A Critique of James Franklin's Account of Formal Science.
James Franklin (1999). Structure and Domain-Independence in the Formal Sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30:721-723.
Donald Lawson Turcotte, John Rundle & Hans Frauenfelder (eds.) (2002). Self-Organized Complexity in the Physical, Biological, and Social Sciences. National Academy of Sciences.
Larry Arnhart (2007). The Behavioral Sciences Are Historical Sciences of Emergent Complexity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):18-19.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,130 of 722,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?