Keplerian illusions: Geòmetrical pictures vs optical images in Kepler's visual theory

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Gerd Buchdahl (1972). Methodological Aspects of Kepler's Theory of Refraction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 3 (3):265-298.
    Citations of this work BETA
    A. Malet (2001). The Power of Images: Mathematics and Metaphysics in Hobbes's Optics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):303-333.
    Similar books and articles
    A. Malet (2001). The Power of Images: Mathematics and Metaphysics in Hobbes's Optics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):303-333.
    Dominic Gregory (2010). Pictures, Pictorial Contents and Vision. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):15-32.
    Stephen L. Macknik & Michael M. Haglund (1999). Optical Images of Visible and Invisible Percepts in the Primary Visual Cortex of Primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96 (26):15208-15210.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-09-02

    Total downloads

    9 ( #128,851 of 1,088,873 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    3 ( #30,950 of 1,088,873 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.