Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||We consider the following question within both Newtonian physics and relativity theory. "Given two point particles X and Y, if Y is rotating relative to X, does it follow that X is rotating relative to Y?" As it stands the question is ambiguous. We discuss one way to make it precise and show that, on that reading at least, the answers given by the two theories are radically different. The relation of relative orbital rotation turns out to be symmetric in Newtonian physics, but not in relativity theory.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Richard T. W. Arthur, Time Lapse and the Degeneracy of Time: Gödel, Proper Time and Becoming in Relativity Theory.
David Malament (2006). Classical Relativity Theory. In Jeremy N. Butterfield & John Earman (eds.), Philosophy of Physics. Elsevier.
David Malament (1985). A Modest Remark About Reichenbach, Rotation, and General Relativity. Philosophy of Science 52 (4):615-620.
Mario Bacelar Valente, Did the Concepts of Space and Time Change That Much with the 1905 Theory of Relativity?
Ardnés Rivadulla (2004). The Newtonian Limit of Relativity Theory and the Rationality of Theory Change. Synthese 141 (3):417 - 429.
Hermann Bondi (1964). Relativity and Common Sense. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Dagfinn Føllesdal (2001). Relativity, Rotation and Rigidity. Erkenntnis 54 (1):31-38.
John Hyman (2005). What, If Anything, Are Colours Relative To? Philosophy 80 (4):475-494.
Harald Nordenson (1969). Relativity, Time and Reality: A Critical Investigation of the Einstein Theory of Relativity From a Logical Point of View. London, Allen & Unwin.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,517 of 739,053 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,338 of 739,053 )
How can I increase my downloads?