David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This paper relates the concept of “discourse” (in the discourse-ethics’ meaning) with the concept of “social justice.” I maintain that the social nature of reason is a condition of possibility of such justice. According to the Alexy-Habermas system, the rules for the practical discourse mean in their third level the conditions of symmetry, that is, the absence of privileges among the participants. My paper introduces the concept of discursive fairness, referred to the requirements for maintaining the discursive symmetry, even under circumstances of non-discursive, but real asymmetry. Two principles of discursive fairness are offered (by analogy to Rawls’ “principles of justice”): 1. equality of rights among the participants in the practical discourse, and 2. possibility of reviewing all arguments used in the discourse, together with guarantees of benefits for the unsuccessful participants
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Arash Abizadeh (2007). On the Philosophy/Rhetoric Binaries: Or, is Habermasian Discourse Motivationally Impotent? Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (4):445-472.
Dave Elder-Vass (2011). The Causal Power of Discourse. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (2):143-160.
Piet Strydom (2006). Intersubjectivity – Interactionist or Discursive? Reflections on Habermas’ Critique of Brandom. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):155-172.
Cristina Lafont (2003). Procedural Justice?: Implications of the Rawls-Habermas Debate for Discourse Ethics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2):163-181.
Warren French & David Allbright (1998). Resolving a Moral Conflict Through Discourse. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):177-194.
Max Urchs (1995). Discursive Logic Towards a Logic of Rational Discourse. Studia Logica 54 (2):231 - 249.
Xunwu Chen (2009). Justice: The Neglected Argument and the Pregnant Vision. Asian Philosophy 19 (2):189 – 198.
Susanne Lettow (2006). The Value of Justice. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:183-187.
Pyung-Joong Yoon (2001). The Political Philosophy of Intersubjectivity and the Logic of Discourse. Human Studies 24 (1-2):57-68.
Michael S. Pritchard & Wade L. Robison (1981). Justice and the Treatment of Animals: A Critique of Rawls. Environmental Ethics 3 (1):55-61.
Axel Seemann (2004). Lifeworld, Discourse, and Realism: On Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Truth. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (4):503-514.
Benjamin K. Sovacool (2010). Erasing Knowledge: The Discursive Structure of Globalization. Social Epistemology 24 (1):15 – 28.
Gerrit K. Kimsma & Evert van Leeuwen (2005). The Human Body as Field of Conflict Between Discourses. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):559-574.
Sylvie Loriaux (2012). Fairness in International Economic Cooperation: Moving Beyond Rawls's Duty of Assistance. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (1):19-39.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads15 ( #265,135 of 1,939,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #161,507 of 1,939,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?