Schleiermacher’s Metaphor

In Adriana Serban & Larisa Cercel (eds.), Friedrich Schleiermacher and the Question of Translation. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 185-196 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/9783110375916-012

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

De betekenis von Schleiermacher voor vandaag. De jubileumbundel over Schleiermacher van de Archivio di filosofia Schleiermacher aujourd'hui. Sur le volume consacré à Schleiermacher par la revue Archivio di Filosofia. [REVIEW]N. Schreurs - 1987 - Bijdragen 48 (1):67-74.
Schleiermacher's Hermeneutic and Its Critics: RICHARD L. CORLISS.Richard L. Corliss - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (3):363-379.
Schleiermacher, Realism, and Epistemic Modesty: A Reply to my Critics.Jacqueline Mariña - 2010 - In Brent Sockness & Wilhelm Gräb (eds.), Schleiermacher, the Study of Religion, and the Future of Theology. de Gruyter.
Gadamers verständnis und missverständnis Von Schleiermacher.Ben Vedder - 2003 - Bijdragen 64 (4):400-420.
Objects of metaphor.Samuel D. Guttenplan - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
On 'nothing to distinguish' Schleiermacher and Otto: reply to Smith.Andrew Dole - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):449-468.
Schleiermacher on the Philosopher’s Stone: the Shaping of Schleiermacher’s Early Ethics by the Kantian Legacy.Jacqueline Mariña - 1999 - Journal of Religion 79 (2):193-215.
Schleiermacher's soliloquies: an English translation of the Monologen, with a critical introduction and appendix.Friedrich Schleiermacher - 1926 - Westport, Conn.: Hyperion Press. Edited by Horace Leland Friess.
On ‘nothing to distinguish’ Schleiermacher and Otto: Reply to Smith: Andrew Dole.Andrew Dole - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):449-468.
Feeling of absolute dependence or absolute feeling of dependence? (What Schleiermacher really said and why it matters).Georg Behrens - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (4):471-481.
Ritschl's Critique of Schleiermacher's Theological Ethics.James M. Brandt - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):51 - 72.
The Pious Spirit.Patrick Donald Dinsmore - 1993 - Dissertation, Drew University
Introduction.Jacqueline Marina - 2005 - In Jacqueline Mariña (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schleiermacher on Religion and the Natural Order.Andrew Dole - 2010 - Oup Usa.
Schleiermacher Contra Lindbeck on the Status of Doctrinal Sentences.Georg Behrens - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (4):399 - 417.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-07

Downloads
7 (#1,351,854)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references