The Just War Theory and the Ethical Governance of Research
Science and Engineering Ethics (forthcoming)
| Abstract | This article analyses current trends in and future expectations of nanotechnology and other key enabling technologies for security as well as dual use nanotechnology from the perspective of the ethical Just War Theory (JWT), interpreted as an instrument to increase the threshold for using armed force for solving conflicts. The aim is to investigate the relevance of the JWT to the ethical governance of research. The analysis gives rise to the following results. From the perspective of the JWT, military research should be evaluated with different criteria than research for civil or civil security applications. From a technological perspective, the boundaries between technologies for civil and military applications are fuzzy. Therefore the JWT offers theoretical grounds for making clear distinctions between research for military, civil security and other applications that are not obvious from a purely technological perspective. Different actors bear responsibility for development of the technology than for resorting to armed force for solving conflicts or for use of weapons and military technologies in combat. Different criteria should be used for moral judgment of decisions made by each type of actor in each context. In addition to evaluation of potential consequences of future use of the weapons or military technologies under development, the JWT also prescribes ethical evaluation of the inherent intent and other foreseeable consequences of the development itself of new military technologies. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames Pattison (2008). Just War Theory and the Privatization of Military Force. Ethics and International Affairs 22 (2):143–162.
Jessica Wolfendale (2008). Performance-Enhancing Technologies and Moral Responsibility in the Military. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):28 – 38.
Shawn Kaplan (2012). Just War Theory: What Is It Good For? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 19 (2):4-14.
J. Pattison (2012). The Legitimacy of the Military, Private Military and Security Companies, and Just War Theory. European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):131-154.
James Q. Whitman (2012). The Verdict of Battle: The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War. Harvard University Press.
Christopher J. Eberle (2012). Shari'a Reasoning and the Justice of Religious War. Philosophia 40 (2):195-211.
Dan Demetriou (forthcoming). Honor War Theory: Romance or Reality? Philosophical Papers.
Lucas (2009). Pirates and PMCs. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):87-94.
Kamilla Kjølberg & Fern Wickson (2007). Social and Ethical Interactions with Nano: Mapping the Early Literature. NanoEthics 1 (2).
Steven Lee (2012). Ethics and War: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Jeffrey Kovac (forthcoming). Science, Ethics and War: A Pacifist's Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-02-28Total downloads4 ( #178,473 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
