David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):525 - 535 (1996)
This study investigated the attitudinal responses of 403 undergraduate students with respect to nine hypothetical marketing moral dilemmas. Participants varied by gender, major, and age.It was found that undergraduate women responded more ethically on the hypothetical marketing moral dilemmas, as hypothesized. Secondly, chosen major did not make a difference on cognitive, affective, or behavioral responses. Further, the overall means for each scenario were in the morally correct direction in every case. Also, all intercorrelations for each story were significant. Finally, whenever there was a nonchance finding for age, the oldest participants answered more morally than the youngest subjects.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Roberta Bampton & Patrick Maclagan (2009). Does a 'Care Orientation' Explain Gender Differences in Ethical Decision Making? A Critical Analysis and Fresh Findings. Business Ethics 18 (2):179-191.
Vykinta Kligyte, Richard T. Marcy, Ethan P. Waples, Sydney T. Sevier, Elaine S. Godfrey, Michael D. Mumford & Dean F. Hougen (2008). Application of a Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training in the Physical Sciences and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):251-278.
Richard Bernardi, Caryn Lecca, Jennifer Murphy & Elizabeth Sturgis (2011). Does Education Influence Ethical Decisions? An International Study. Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):235-256.
Derek Dalton & Marc Ortegren (2011). Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):73-93.
Mehran Nejati, Reza Jamali & Mostafa Nejati (2009). Students' Ethical Behavior in Iran. Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (4):277-285.
Similar books and articles
Susan C. Borkowski & Yusuf J. Ugras (1998). Business Students and Ethics: A Meta-Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1117-1127.
Gene R. Laczniak & Patrick E. Murphy (1991). Fostering Ethical Marketing Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (4):259 - 271.
George G. Brenkert (2008). Marketing Ethics. Blackwell Pub..
Ishmael P. Akaah (1990). Attitudes of Marketing Professionals Toward Ethics in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Comparison. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 9 (1):45 - 53.
David J. Fritzsche & Helmut Becker (1983). Ethical Behavior of Marketing Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 2 (4):291 - 299.
Wendy Horwitz (2000). Environmental Dilemmas: The Resolutions of Student Activists. Ethics and Behavior 10 (3):281 – 308.
Lucy A. Quatrella & Diane Keyser Wentworth (1995). Students' Perceptions of Unequal Status Dating Relationships in Academia. Ethics and Behavior 5 (3):249 – 259.
Daulatram B. Lund (2000). An Empirical Examination of Marketing Professionals' Ethical Behavior in Differing Situations. Journal of Business Ethics 24 (4):331 - 342.
George M. Zinkhan, Michael Bisesi & Mary Jane Saxton (1989). Mbas' Changing Attitudes Toward Marketing Dilemmas: 1981–1987. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):963 - 974.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #355,154 of 1,102,965 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,509 of 1,102,965 )
How can I increase my downloads?