David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (2):84-89 (2006)
Do non-human animals have rights? The answer to this question depends on whether animals have morally relevant mental properties. Mindreading is the human activity of ascribing mental states to other organisms. Current knowledge about the evolution and cognitive structure of mindreading indicates that human ascriptions of mental states to non-human animals are very inaccurate. The accuracy of human mindreading can be improved with the help of scientific studies of animal minds. But the scientific studies by themselves do not by themselves solve the problem of how to map psychological similarities (and differences) between humans and animals onto a distinction between morally relevant and morally irrelevant mental properties. The current limitations of human mindreading – whether scientifically aided or not – have practical consequences for the rational justification of claims about which rights (if any) non-human animals should be accorded.
|Keywords||Animal Animal Rights Anthropomorphism Ethics Evolution Mind Mind Reading|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Hadley (2012). Confining 'Disenhanced'Animals. NanoEthics 6 (1):41-46.
Irina Meketa (2014). A Critique of the Principle of Cognitive Simplicity in Comparative Cognition. Biology and Philosophy 29 (5):731-745.
Lisa Bortolotti (2007). Disputes Over Moral Status: Philosophy and Science in the Future of Bioethics. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 15 (2):153-8.
Paul Morris, Sarah Knight & Sarah Lesley (2012). Belief in Animal Mind: Does Familiarity with Animals Influence Beliefs About Animal Emotions? Society and Animals 20 (3):211-224.
Lisa Bortolotti (2008). What Does Fido Believe? Think 7 (19):7-15.
Similar books and articles
H. J. McCloskey (1979). Moral Rights and Animals. Inquiry 22 (1-4):23 – 54.
Angus Taylor (1996). Animal Rights and Human Needs. Environmental Ethics 18 (3):249-264.
Claire Molloy (2011). Popular Media and Animals. Palgrave Macmillan.
Uriah Kriegel (2013). Animal Rights: A Non‐Consequentialist Approach. In K. Petrus & M. Wild (eds.), Animal Minds and Animal Ethics. Transcript
Wesley J. Smith (2009). A Rat is a Pig is a Dog is a Boy: The Human Cost of the Animal Rights Movement. Encounter Books.
Kelly Oliver (2010). Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness. Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Mark Rowlands (2009). Animal Rights: Moral Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mylan Engel (2010). The Philosophy of Animal Rights: A Brief Introduction for Students and Teachers. Lantern Books.
Fredrik Karlsson (2012). Critical Anthropomorphism and Animal Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):707-720.
David DeGrazia (2002). Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads544 ( #1,572 of 1,792,018 )
Recent downloads (6 months)163 ( #1,330 of 1,792,018 )
How can I increase my downloads?