Reproductive cloning, genetic engineering and the autonomy of the child: the moral agent and the open future
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (2):87-93 (2007)
Some authors have argued that the human use of reproductive cloning and genetic engineering should be prohibited because these biotechnologies would undermine the autonomy of the resulting child. In this paper, two versions of this view are discussed. According to the first version, the autonomy of cloned and genetically engineered people would be undermined because knowledge of the method by which these people have been conceived would make them unable to assume full responsibility for their actions. According to the second version, these biotechnologies would undermine autonomy by violating these people’s right to an open future. There is no evidence to show that people conceived through cloning and genetic engineering would inevitably or even in general be unable to assume responsibility for their actions; there is also no evidence for the claim that cloning and genetic engineering would inevitably or even in general rob the child of the possibility to choose from a sufficiently large array of life plans
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David Gurnham (2012). Bioethics as Science Fiction. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (02):235-246.
Darryl Gunson (2012). What Is the Habermasian Perspective in Bioethics? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (02):188-199.
Darryl Gunson (2011). Are All Rational Moralities Equivalent? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):238-247.
Similar books and articles
Rosamund Scott (2007). Choosing Between Possible Lives: Law and Ethics of Prenatal and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Hart.
Matti Häyry (2010). Rationality and the Genetic Challenge: Making People Better? Cambridge University Press.
Kavita R. Shah (2010). Selecting Barrenness: The Use of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis by Congenitally Infertile Women to Select for Infertility. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):7-21.
Robert Lane (2006). Safety, Identity and Consent: A Limited Defense of Reproductive Human Cloning. Bioethics 20 (3):125–135.
C. F. Gethmann & F. Thiele (2001). Moral Arguments Against the Cloning of Humans. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (1):35-46.
S. Matthew Liao (2008). Selecting Children: The Ethics of Reproductive Genetic Engineering. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):973-991.
Joyce C. Havstad (2010). Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties. Bioethics 24 (2):71-77.
Helga Kuhse (2001). Should Cloning Be Banned for the Sake of the Child? Poiesis and Praxis 1 (1):17-33.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads81 ( #18,663 of 1,139,993 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #32,713 of 1,139,993 )
How can I increase my downloads?