Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives
Oxford University Press (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesVasso Kindi (2005). The Relation of History of Science to Philosophy of Science In. Perspectives on Science 13 (4).
Michael Ruse (2002). Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives (Review). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45 (1):141-144.
T. Shanahan (2001). Methodological and Contextual Factors in the Dawkins/Gould Dispute Over Evolutionary Progress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (1):127-151.
Marcelo Dascal (2001). Controversies and Epistemology. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:159-192.
Roger H. Stuewer (ed.) (1970/1989). Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science. Gordon and Breach.
Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.) (2000). Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Maurizio Mamiani (2000). The Structure of a Scientific Controversy: Hooke Versus Newton About Colors. In Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-06-22Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
